• Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s Google Plus all over again.

    If people wanted the bird app, they would have already got the bird app, if they don’t like the bird app, they would have got a Mastodon account.

    It feels like the same reason that Reels isn’t doing well, people who wanted TikTok would have already got TikTok, you can’t force Instagram users to like Twitter/TikTok but on their Insta account instead.

    • marmo7ade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      if they don’t like the bird app, they would have got a Mastodon account.

      Doubt. The venn diagram of people who don’t want to use twitter and people who know what mastodon is, are separate circles with little overlap. Mastodon is not mainstream, like reddit. Redditors are still in denial about this.

      Go ask a random 40 year old if they know what reddit is.

      Even less people know about mastodon.

      • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I should have been more specific, what I meant was "people who want to use a microblogging platform but don’t like who’s running the bird app. "

        But I would say reddit is mainstream enough that random 40 year olds probably has heard of it now, after all the large big profile celebrity AMAs, it’s the 10th most visited site in the world and 6th in the US.

      • gunnm@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just to point out many ex-Digg users are 30-40 years old. I would agree a 40yo normie who only use Facebook wouldn’t know about Reddit.

    • sriracha_no_big_deal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It feels like the same reason that Reels isn’t doing well, people who wanted TikTok would have already got TikTok, you can’t force Instagram users to like Twitter/TikTok but on their Insta account instead.

      I’m never going to download or sign up for TikTok. I know Meta isn’t really that great as far as privacy goes, but at least they don’t share information directly with the CCP. Fuck the CCP. IG Reels works just fine for me. I actually can’t stand the IG home feed because of the algorithm showing me what it wants to show me instead of a chronological timeline of the posts of the people I follow, so I mostly just use IG for stories and Reels.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I hate that curated list bullshit. It made both FB and YouTube worse, too. And both were intended to manipulate users into spending more time there. Ironically, I haven’t been on as many YouTube dives into the random following interesting videos from the recommended ones since they started curating their list based on what you’ve previously watched (and seemingly picking one or two of them to tunnel vision on).

      • gunnm@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        All social media based in the U.S. share information to the three letter agency, confirmed by the NSA leaks.

        • jerdle_lemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I trust America more than China. If some foreign government has to have my data, I’d rather it be America.

    • fubo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google+ had more than one thing wrong with it. Just for example …

      The precursor to Google+ was called Google Buzz, and it was rolled out to Gmail users in a way that exposed privacy & security problems with Gmail contacts. This led to a lawsuit and a settlement which Google had to obey when releasing their next “social media” attempt.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Buzz#Privacy

      As a result, Google+ became a heavy-handed effort that tried to hew closely to the settlement’s privacy & consent requirements while assimilating seemingly-unrelated projects such as YouTube comments.

      • jarfil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        IMHO Google+ had one good thing: Circles. You could define groups of people to share stuff with, without those people having to “join a group”.

        I don’t think people understood it well, though.