The question above for the most part, been reading up on it. Also want to it for learning purposes.

  • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Haha, no not really. IPv6 has the ability to provide public IP address for each device, but that doesn’t mean it will have to. Other than number of possible addresses, nothing is different. Routing, firewalls, NATs, etc. All remains the same.

    • 30021190@lemmy.cloud.aboutcher.co.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      IPv6 doesn’t support NAT… Or am I woefully out of date.

      But your home router will just firewall like it does already but you don’t have NAT as a simple fall back for “security”. It does make running internal services much easier as you no long need to port forward. So you can run two webservers on port 80 and they be bother allowed inbound without doing horrible load balance or NAT translation.

      • NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        IPv6 has NPTv6, which allows you to translate from one prefix into another.

        Useful if you’ve got dual WAN, and can’t advertise your own addressing via the ISP. You can use NPTv6 to translate between your local prefix and the public prefixes. But NPTv6 is completely stateless. It’s literally a 1:1 mapping between the prefixes.

        • orangeboats@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          IPv6 has both NAT66 and NPTv6. (Yeah, it’s confusing.) NAT66 is more like the traditional stateful NAT that all of us know and understand.