Being the same line of argument as your previous post only reframed and with a falacy of guilt by association thrown in, the argument was already refuted in my last post.
I mean, I suppose I could point out that this last post of yours relies on the idea that Muslims are all the same hence Israel is justified in attacking Palestinians because … Iran.
But that would just be repeating myself, again and pointing out, again the racist “logic” used to tie all those actors together as “guilty as one” and hence “any of them can be targetted because the actions of any other make Israel be ‘existentially threathened’”.
I suppose I could also point out that “the country is both strong (has nukes and the support of the greatest military power of the world) and weak (is “existencially threatened”) at the same time” is a very traditional Fascist cliché used to excuse aggression.
You’re not exactly dispelling the whole a-lot-like-the-Nazis impression of Israel.
The existential threat is the ideology of every country surrounded Israel, one of which is actively trying to develop its own nuclear weapons and which has sworn it will use them against Israel if it does.
Oh man, doubling down on fantasy now with the added “YoU KNoZ noTHingZ WHiLe I KNoZ aLL” style of “argument”.
What perfect example of the wishfull thinking and self-delusion of rabid racism overriding all traces of even the simplest logic.
You’re really working hard at proving the point of the guy I originally answered to in this string of comments, as well as my own.
Hey, maybe try refuting any of my arguments instead of a bunch of hyperbole and nonsense.
Being the same line of argument as your previous post only reframed and with a falacy of guilt by association thrown in, the argument was already refuted in my last post.
I mean, I suppose I could point out that this last post of yours relies on the idea that Muslims are all the same hence Israel is justified in attacking Palestinians because … Iran.
But that would just be repeating myself, again and pointing out, again the racist “logic” used to tie all those actors together as “guilty as one” and hence “any of them can be targetted because the actions of any other make Israel be ‘existentially threathened’”.
I suppose I could also point out that “the country is both strong (has nukes and the support of the greatest military power of the world) and weak (is “existencially threatened”) at the same time” is a very traditional Fascist cliché used to excuse aggression.
You’re not exactly dispelling the whole a-lot-like-the-Nazis impression of Israel.
The existential threat is the ideology of every country surrounded Israel, one of which is actively trying to develop its own nuclear weapons and which has sworn it will use them against Israel if it does.