• Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The explanation behind this is actually pretty disturbing. Due to selective breeding the growth hormones we feed chickens in America, the chickens become fully grown much earlier than usual. It’s like the equivalent of becoming a fully grown adult by the time you are the age of five, but you still have the mental and muscle capacity of a five year old.

    Between 1957 and 2005, chickens raised for their meat quadrupled in size due to selective breeding. They grow to their slaughter weight in just 6 weeks, and their legs often struggle to support their own body weight.

    https://animalequality.org/blog/2021/09/01/green-meat/

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’ve raised Cornish crosses and fed them normal, quality feed without any hormones: they ended up looking just like the chicken on the right at about 8 weeks old.

      They’ve been selectively bred over the decades to grow as fast as possible, as big as possible, docile, and stupid.

          • wafflez@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Non-human animals share all the traits you value in humans to not inflict pain and death on them. Ability to feel pain, have future goals and desires, build social bonds etc. Choosing to hurt them purely because they’re animals is arbitrary. Would you be fine with someone hurting and then killing and eating someone’s dog just because it falls into your two criteria? Tastes good and causes death and pain to an animal.

            • Sorgan71@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I dont want to inflict pain on humans specifically because they are humans. Your desire to not hurt these animals is just as arbitrary as my indifference to their suffering.

              • wafflez@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                My desire to not hurt animals isn’t because they’re animals. Discriminating against non-human animals is just an arbitrary class like discrimimating on race, intelligence, or sexuality etc. It’s more reasonable to choose morally relevant principles like whether or not we should inflict suffering, death, or mass breed their species and propetually deny them of freedom because they can feel pain, they want to live, and they want to be free. There’s no trait that is specifically for humans and not for non-human animals and thus its arbitrary.

  • The Barto@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    So is that username pronounced “Ho Mobile” as in a car for hoes or “Homo Bile” as in stomach acid from gay people?

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Now that I’ve experienced 4202 x gravity, I must train in 4202 x gravity!

  • Raxiel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I guess that’s also why people started having turkey for big family gatherings even through chicken tastes better.

    Now a chicken is perfectly adequate for a family of four, or even six depending on the trimmings.