I would really rather that these were actual examples, and not conspiracy theories. We all have our own unsubstantiated ideas about what shadowy no-gooders are doing, but I’d rather hear about things that are actually happening.

  • towerful@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    ICE rely on 100% carbon fuels. There is no other option.
    EVs don’t have to. If the grid is decarbonised, they could run on 100% renewable energy. Even if there are fossil fuels powering the grid, the centralisation of the combustion should make it an easier target to scrub/capture pollution from.
    Tire pollution is pretty bad tho.

    While EVs aren’t going to save the planet, hopefully the battery tech and infrastructure investments will help pave the way to better solutions.

    • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      To get anywhere close to the grid being considered decarbonised (I’m ignoring carbon capture here because that’s not going to happen at any meaningful scale unless we geoengineer shit) all of the materials, all of the manufacturing and all of the building and maintenance would have to be run on renewable energy. Like from the mines of Australia over to all of the plants in china to assembly, for every component.

      And to have it make any difference at all, you have to do it within the next 30 or so years. And then there’s still the tyres, also you gotta do the entire shit again for the very climate friendly processing of building roads that withstand cars for give or take a season, extra challenge mode due to the increased weight of EVs. And also then there’s still the tyres.

      hopefully the battery tech and infrastructure investments will help pave the way to better solutions.

      We’ve already got those, it’s called trains and bicycles, former have been EVs for like a century