Nobody tells me what I’m going to do or where I will be going and when that happens

I am open to invitations or requests or suggestions where my involvement is desired or ostensibly necesary for somone else. But I will never respond to this as a statement of fact or in the form of a threat

  • CheeseBread@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you are a giving person, you have to put a limit on how much you can give. Takers have no limit.

    I have to remember to look out for myself because even though I’m trying to look out for a lot of people I care about, no one is looking out for me.

    • sab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      In my experience it’s not so much about putting a limit as it is about avoiding takers and finding other givers. But one has to be careful not to be used. :)

      • semi_sentient@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I find it’s important to allow yourself to be vulnerable to a moderate degree, to give people the chance to expose themselves as a giver or taker.

        • cheese_greater@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I feel like you might want to make sure you have all your bases covered and that you’re not setting yourself up for desperation/exploitation. Its so important with other people where this is suspected, to fail and fail quickly and and as harmlessly as possible.

      • cheese_greater@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I feel like its still a useful exercise/practice to be able to reinforce one’s limits and contingencies on a regular basis with those they are circumstance-bound to be close to or work with so they are able to do that universally and at all times