Whenever I watch old movies the characters always have a different tone than they have now. It seems to have changed somewhere from the 2000s. Is it just me or did something change?
You must log in or register to comment.
tl;dr: Because of technological advancements in recording equipment.
Maybe this Helps: Why we all need subtitles now
Here I am thinking I was the only one with this problem. I’m at the office and can’t watch the video itself, but I definitely will tonight. Thank you for sharing!
This was awesome, thank you
Anakin Padme meme.jpg:
I’ve invented new mic tech!
You’re going to use that to make audio more intelligible right?
…
Right?!
If you’re talking about speech, I think you’re talking about the “mid-Atlantic” accent, although that fell off earlier than 2000. It was a fake upper-class accent actors were trained in. I don’t know much more than that about it.
Also politicians like Kennedy did it. And so did jerry springer when he was a politician (he did away with it for his show). It’s kind of funny really
Kennedy’s was just a Massachusetts accent, AFAIK.
It sounded real forced. We had a movie made in our country with some shots in US. Throughout these scenes all Americans had this uniform accent, even the black american actors. Glad they decided to ditch this
Aside from the Mid-Atlantic accent, it’s also just microphones and recording technology has gotten much better.
I know Robert Altman revolutionized a lot of how dialogue in movies is recorded, out of necessity for how he was setting up some of his shots (multi-tracking because people are talking over each other, etc.)
The accent? It’s the Mid-Atlantic accent that a lot of old actors were trained to speak with. In more modern times, people have just started using their natural accent or an accent that better fits the character they are portraying.
It’s similar to the Received Pronunciation you’d hear older British people using (eg how the Queen used to talk).
Can you give an example? Done you mean the dialogue, soundtrack, foley…?
I know exactly what you mean, for example the production quality between What’s Eating Gilbert Grape (1993) and Liar Liar (1995) is significant. Although I didn’t notice it at the time, a lot of late 90s or early 2000s movies had this same sort of production style that looks like it was filmed in 1983 but with 2000s clothes like the American Pie series, IKWYDLS, and Old School. But Bring It On had the newer aesthetic.
I have two rough metrics of grainy and dusty that I use for this. Grainier movies are usually film and poor quality at that. Like Ferris Buellers Day Off is film but advanced production quality for its time and thus not so grainy. Dusty movies are more about the degree of western/prairie motifs like wood shacks, dirt roads, unkempt grasslands and dilapidated fences. Both grainy and dusty movies tend to have muffled audio and very formal speech, ie The Sound of Music.
Something that some of the other replies have missed is that older movies were often shot (and a lot of actors were trained) from the perspective of a “stage play for the silver screen.” Stage plays have to work for large audiences, and so they tend to feature more exaggerated voice / body movements. These tricks were used on movies for a long time, but have faded as visual effects and sound recording have gotten better
deleted by creator
