I just platinumed Jedi Survivor (which was awesome, you should play it) and I’m looking for my next new awesomeness to play.

  • TheSpookiestUser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Re: Stellaris - me too, and I bet a lot of other people as well. It has what my friend group calls “the Civilization problem”; the initial setup and expansion is by far more interesting than the late game when things are more static. Stellaris does it better than the Civ games, in my opinion (mid and late game crises and events help), but still falls into the same trap. I’m not really sure how this could be solved, but maybe something like late-game expansion opportunities (like the L cluster, but more) and more robust internal politics and espionage could help.

    • BD1sHappyFeet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Glad to know it’s not just me. Civ and Stellaris both, game progression for me goes like: fun, fun, fun, yeah screw that guy!, fun … getting less fun, definitely not as fun anymore, meh.

      I just picked up Cult of the Lamb which is at least silly fun. Bonus points for blasphemy!

    • giacomo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. I’ve seen there is a mod to add more mid/late game encounters or content, but I haven’t tried it yet. I think more developed diplomatic events would make mid/late game more interesting. Most of my playthroughs end up being an arms race towards the end, which sure that can be a fun aspect of the game, but not super interesting. Very much like civ, and I think you’re correct they both suffer from the late game “domination” aspect.

      My idea of a successful Stellaris game it not coming in first, but making it to the end with a functional empire.

      I’m also probably a noob when it comes to Stellaris, but I still enjoy it.