• JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Words change. He came up with a really good one and people ran with it. It no longer means what he initially made it to mean. That’s how all language in all of the world works.

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re saying that if someone wants to descibe enshittification they need to invent a word for it?

      • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Did you reply to the right guy? That’s definitely not what I said.

        • Corgana@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You said that the definition of enshittification has changed since January, meaning that if someone wanted to describe “the process formerly known as enshittification” they’d presumeably need a new word, right?

          I not disagreeing with you that words change over time, I’m just trying to keep up!

    • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except it means nothing in that usage. Some people ran with it. Others decided to not be ridiculous and just apply it without rhyme or reason. Outside the Fediverse, it’s nearly unknown. Inside the fediverse, when it’s misused, it’s usually in a very obvious and uncritical manner. It is still commonly used properly.

      Don’t take the power away from words just because you literally like the word itself. It’s immature.

      If you use it to apply to all unpopular corporate decisions, it’s no longer powerful and doesn’t have any meaning.

      • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This isn’t a new thing, my brother. Half the words you use on a given day probably had a different meaning when they came about. If anyone is being immature here, it’s you guys who seem to think English should be static and never updated. And for what it’s worth, I think it’s used pretty accurately when I see it get used, and I think the way it was used in this thread is apt.

        • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          So now we don’t have a word anymore to describe something that we used to have a word. And we already had words to describe what the person above was.

          The language has lost use.

          • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Again, that’s how language has worked for literally centuries, but I completely disagree with your conclusion. If you’re not yet aware, some words, can have multiple meanings even with the same spelling.

            • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Except due to the new usage one now has to basically define it to give it the correct context. It’s lost its power to be used and immediately understood. If what you say is true, it cannot be used efficiently to why it was coined.

              And pretending it’s not suddenly being used because of Doctorow is naive.