• Chup@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is quite interesting, as commonly weapon system sales can be based on data sheets, video presentations, theoretical scenarios, shooting range tests or 3rd party experience and reports.

    In this case, Ukraine was able to test various IFV models from multiple countries in an actual war. And then after testing, Ukraine chose the CV-90. That’s a good selling point for BAE systems.

    • philpo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know people (international volunteers&UKR nationals) that worked on the CV-90 trial (or worked with it in other countries) and they are highly appreciating it and are extremely happy UKR has chosen it (even the German ones who are very fond of the Puma).

      According to them only the German Puma gets close to it but does not offer that much flexibility in terms of variants - the CV-90 is available as AA, Forward Observer, Command, Mortar, Recovery, electronic warfare, engineering, APC. While the Puma currently offers only the IFV and a potential command variant and seems to be much harder to maintain.

      Seems like a really good fit for the current situation Ukraine is in. Being able to easily salvage parts from various vehicles with one base can be crucial and it seems like the CV-90 does not have more of a Achilles’ heel than other vehicles.