• misk@sopuli.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It’s a small company with very little resources, and they only take 30% cut of nearly all PC game sales so they couldn’t afford it. /s

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why would they prioritize resources into something with low demand…?

      • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Because they are selling games on this platform today and the reasonable expectation would be that they properly support it. If they deem it too much of a cost then they can exit the market rather than half ass it.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          There wasn’t a reason to before but now they are doing it now because there’s enough of a market to justify it…I’m not sure what you think they did so wrong

          • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Have you used Steam on ARM Macs? Rosetta 2 is a dynamic recompiler which does badly when emulating things that recompile dynamically themselves, like web browsers, which Steam is essentially. Scrolling was choppy, power efficiency was bad. M1 and newer chips brute forced their way through this because they’re so fast but Steam performance was embarrassing.