cross-posted from: https://biglemmowski.win/post/6224801
Michael Gloss, 21, was the son of CIA Deputy Director for Digital Innovation Julianne Gallina Gloss, and Iraq war veteran Larry Gloss.
Before arriving in Russia on August 13, 2023, Gloss was travelling around Europe. On his Vkontakte page bio, he wrote: “I ran away from home (and) traveled the world. I hate fascism.”
On April 4, 2024, he was killed, likely during a Russian offensive near Bakhmut, however, his burial in the U.S. did not take place until December 2024, Important Stories reports.
🌻
not that i would die for fucking russia but its the lesser evil vs the us. i suppose its easier to see that if you are closely related to cia people.
the us has done and and even admitted to stuff far worse than most out there. its not the biggest military budget in the world (of all time?) for nothing.
Even if that were true, what does that have to do with Ukraine?
ukraine is an US proxy to shoot at russia. the us is provoking and paying for the war to weaken russia.
a win for russia is a loss for the west, which because of imperialism and colonialism, is a win for everyone else.
But of course! Those poor Russians just had to do a whole invasion, entirely out of self defense!
i didnt really put it that way, but kind of.
the cia has been talking openly about provoking it since the mid to late 2000s. putin has also been saying he would take nato expansion as a sign of aggression. this war was completely avoidable.
this talk of “evul russia” or “poor ukraine” is just propaganda to manufacture consent for spending billions on an useless war instead of addressing poverty or something useful, and people should stop believing it. this war is not about morals or being “good” or “evil” at all.
I’m almost positive that widespread interest in Ukraine joining NATO spiked in popularity AFTER the invasion started and wasn’t even taken seriously until then. So… Russia really created their own problem in that regard.
NATO does not expand (invade to grab land), it is based on membership. “NATO expansion” is well known as putin/FSB propaganda meant for a certain naive audience.
NATO borders with russia are the most peaceful with the low number of russian troops. Internally, Russia is not concerned about NATO, a defense alliance since Russia has the highest number of nukes.
In the media, they will use NATO expansion propaganda because there are naive clowns and useful idiots who will believe in NATO expansion propaganda. Do remember russia was fine with Ukriane joining NATO until they saw they can use it as propaganda to justify russia expansionism. http://www.en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/21598.
Ukraine public support for joining NATO was in the minority before the war, and only after invasion it became majority. Even after Ukraine said they won’t apply to NATO, russia didn’t not stop its expansion. In fact due to russia aggressive expansion even more countries applied to join NATO. Putin knew that russia expansion will encourage more to submit application to join NATO. Putin was warned to stop russia expansion as that just cause more to apply for NATO membership. Furthermore note that expanding russia territories just bring russia closer to NATO, increasing russia border with NATO. Clearly it is not about NATO.
Even, without using NATO, putin will come up with a new reason like nazis, terrorists or LGBTQ or WMDs or security issues ( a country with the most nukes in the world has a security issue? only naive clowns will believe that) or restoring empire/imperialism (which he admitted in interview with carlson) or all of the above each for a different audience. Whatever it takes to get crimea and its warm water ports, and later Donbas for a land bridge and to secure Crimea water supply. Eventually going all the way to Transnistria.
You think things are so simple as poor top nuclear powered russia who is scared of evil tiny Ukraine, for suggesting sending in membership application form to NATO. You are being naive at best. War does not work like a superhero movie.
NATO was created to protect small countries from russia expansionism and stop russia from antagonizing its neighbours. The only way massive nuclear powered russia sees NATO as a threats is that it prevents russia from expansion from expanding russia territories.
NATO was literally created to antagonize Russia. The political process of expanding it IS aggression.
The CIA director was already saying this openly way back in the late 2000s. I’d trust that over stupid media narratives they use to manufacture consent for the war.
Its presence is a threat to them, regardless of who you think of as the good guys. (hint: its not the US empire.)
Expansion (invasion to increase territories)? I think it is pretty clear that it is putin that is pushing for the expansion of russia empire into new territories. The puzzling thing is why is Putin pushing/forcing more countries to sign up as NATO member instead of joining his own CSTO.
i didn’t express myself properly with that parenthesis so i edited it out.
the US empire is the one constantly invading and pushing for expansion.
as i said, provoking a war with russia is the stated goal for the CIA there since at least the late 2000s.
Ukraine is the country being invaded. Russia is the one invading. That is as simple as it is. You invade = you are the aggressor = you are the evil one.
i wish the world was that simple, with simple solutions. i’m still rooting for the best outcome for most people.
if you think this is about “good” and “evil”, you are being naive at best. war doesn’t work like superhero movies.
This is true in most cases. Unless you’re the invader. There will never be an excuse to initiate an invasion.
so by that logic you agree the US is the most evil empire in the planet, and the bigger evil then?
heres your explanation for that guy to have chosen russia instead.