• ryepunk [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The most positive I’ve heard is that it is a by the numbers Bethesda rpg game. It doesn’t try to be anything more. If you liked fallout 4 and skyrim odds are you’ll like this.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Then wait a few months and check some of the in-depth reviews before investing your time. Bethesda’s most well known for its looter shooters with RPG styling.

          I imagine this will follow in similar footsteps. It’ll be well designed, well armed, but it’s not going to be an RPG where your decisions have lasting impact. But hopefully I’m wrong

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Still downloading for me, but I see more than one review saying it takes a long time to get good. I’m keeping my expectations low.

      EDIT: Glad I was warned it starts slow. It does get better if you stick with it.

      EDIT 2: It entertained me for a week. It’s no Skyrim, or even Fallout. I would have been pissed if I’d paid for it.

      • TechnoBabble@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s pretty ok off the bat.

        The only major gripe I have is how segmented the world is by fast travel.

        You can’t just wander around getting into trouble the same as you could in earlier Beth titles. You have to fast travel here, then fast travel there, oh and now you’re done with this “dungeon”? Go fast travel here and there to get back to the city, then fast travel out to your next planet, then fast travel down to the surface.

        Maybe that experience gets less abrasive over time, but I don’t feel like it will.

        One of it’s strengths is the really detailed and interesting environments the game dumps you in early on. Starfield really does look and run great. Granted, I do have a 4070 Ti and 13600k, so maybe get the input of someone with a more average system.

        The armor/weapon/environment systems are also pretty cool, and the loot is unique and interesting, but I haven’t gotten that far into the game, so I can’t say if it keeps up the pace.

        Anyway, to cut this rant short, Starfield is fun, gorgeous, and a little flawed, but it’s a game that’s absolutely worth playing. Maybe not $100 “early access” worth playing, but I wouldn’t feel ripped off if I paid $70.

          • leftzero@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Best comparison I’ve heard (by Gopher, if I recall correctly) is Outer Worlds, but less silly, and bigger by several orders of magnitude.

    • OptimusPrimeRib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve heard nothing but good things about gameplay. But it runs like shit on most systems. A RTX 3080 at 1440p ultra can’t get 60 fps in cities.