• marmo7ade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is plenty they can do. They created this mess with their algorithm. They can undo it by changing it, again.

    Google does not objectively score or rank a site based on what you are actually looking for. They rank based on how much time other people spend on the site. How many other sites link back to the site. They rank based on how many words are on the page, regardless of if that actually matters.

    This is why when you google a recipe, all the top results are blog posts from soccer moms telling a life story about food. You don’t care about that stuff - you just want the recipe. But that’s what google cares about.

    Google can change this.

    • magic_lobster_party@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t think the algorithm is the problem. The problem is that sites started to capitalize on your attention. Everybody wants your sweet little attention so they can earn money from it. Internet also moved into walled gardens of money making machines (like Instagram, YouTube and TikTok).

      It doesn’t matter which algorithm is used. Somebody will crack it and abuse it for their own good.

      There’s no reversing this.

      • spongebue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t matter which algorithm is used. Somebody will crack it and abuse it for their own good.

        If the algorithm gives a bigger shit about giving the answer people are actually looking for, and doesn’t emphasize length, formatting, and other bullshit… And people crack the algorithm by giving exactly that answer I’m looking for, I’d be ok with that.

        But it all starts with the algorithm

        • magic_lobster_party@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s easily abused. Search engines before Google were pure keyword search, but those were quickly abused. People just made websites with all types of keywords just to get on top of search results. Google’s PageRank fixed this - temporarily. People were quick to abuse it too.

          It doesn’t matter what you try to do. Somebody will figure out how to abuse it.

        • CharAhNalaar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But to do that, the algorithm has to know the right answer in the first place. Meaning a human has to tell it what’s right and what’s wrong.

          Have you seen Google’s generative AI tests? They’re trying to do exactly that and it’s mostly useless.

      • 0ddysseus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is exactly right but assumes the nature of the internet must remain the same. The problem is the content and people wanting your sweet little attention. The internet described in the article - the blogosphere and Usenet and the rest, was an internet created by people for people and existed for its own sake. What google has access to now is 3 billion people all trying to scam the others for money. Its a fundamentally different user base and there’s no way a better algorithm can find content that isn’t there

    • bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bro. I’ll never understand why recipes have taken the blog-first, recipe-last approach.