• FauxLiving@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    to have someone

    In order to do this at scale, that’s a lot of someones who all need to be paid. You’d need several people, per city, to manually review traffic cameras and manually issue reports.

    Unless you want to pay $200/mo for traffic updates, you can’t do this using humans.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Growing up, we had 5 TV stations and 20 radio stations that managed to do it just off of cereal advertisements. I’d gladly pay 5 bucks a month for it, and with millions of people in the metro area just having 1% of people use a $5/month service you’d be looking at 6 figures a month, which is plenty to pay for the service.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        The only way to know if it would work would be to roll the dice and make a startup. You’ll need enough cash to cover a year or two of projected operations, the capital to develop the application and infrastructure in addition to the money required to advertise the service.

        At the same time you have to realize that your proposition for potential customers is ‘You can pay us $5 to get the service that Google gives you for free and it only works in this one metro area.’ De-googling is a popular topic on nerd social media but the average person would gladly trade all of their privacy to pay less money.

        If we could magic wand a company into existence and capture all of the privacy focused customer base in a large metro area then yeah, the company could pay the operating expenses. But going from ‘This is a cool idea’ to ‘We have a successful service that has a positive cash flow’ is a hard, capital intensive, process.