• Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean it’s a profit engine for the CCP and it has its own rootkit (that people willingly install) in the form of Vanguard AntiCheat as well as that other one being used in the new DeltaForce game.

      • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        The reality you live in must be nice. The CCP is just a peaceful little government trying to live its peaceful little life and bring people peace and happiness.

        China is a threat though. Destruction of as many computers as possible is a real threat. CCP members being able to request access to control servers and fire employees that might otherwise refuse is a real threat.

        So much of this is automated. You request SSH keys for “a review”, upload a file to the distribution system, it sends it out as an update, and the update waits for the command and control server to say “go” before sending your credit card numbers from Steam to the CCP and bricking your computer. If it ever happens, it will be over before you know what hit you.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        I mean, I’m old enough to remember Edward Snowden’s PRISM leaks. I can’t rule out that a Chinese-backed software company is functioning comparably to its American counterparts.

        It’s just crazy to see how American attitude towards national surveillance has been twisted from “Damn, its bad that the state can spy on me all the time, but if I haven’t done anything wrong there’s probably nothing to worry about” to “It’s important that the people spying on me are Elon Musk and Donald Trump, rather than that evil Xi Jinping.”

  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ll play journalist and link the actual list (PDF). I wondered why Samsung, a company that literally produces military weapons, wasnt on the list. The list is specifically just for Chinese companies. There is apparently a law requiring the Department of Defence maintain and publish this list.

    • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I wondered why Samsung, a company that literally produces military weapons, wasnt on the list.

      The PDF you linked: Designation of Chinese Military Companies.
      Samsung is Korean.

      And while I’m sure the Chinese Government would love to dig out a map from the Han Dynasty, claiming rule over the entire Korean Peninsula, I doubt Samsung is making weapons for them.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Isn’t the South Korean peninsula home to several dozen US military bases?

        You don’t need to go all the way back to the Han Dynasty to find the charter that gives US the right to militarily occupy the continent indefinitely. The Truman Doctrine seems sufficient.

    • mriguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I wondered why Samsung, a company that literally produces military weapons, wasn’t on the list.

      Probably because South Korea is a close military ally.

    • Mojave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      ACTION: Notice of Chinese military companies operating in the United States.

      Where is Samsung from, dog

      • kieron115@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Seriously! I know that BLUF is a thing but do that many people seriously not read past the first line before feeling the need to correct someone on the internet? @[email protected] as a fellow member of the human race let me formally thank you for forming a question, seeking out information that either confirms or denies your question, and informing everyone else who may have had the same misconception.

      • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I am always reminded how precise and verbose one must be in text since it’s so easy to intend one meaning but have people interpret another.