• Tja@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I don’t think my friend with a small growing channel, and the dozens of creators I enjoy are all so rich, but good to know.

    • davidagain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      You know full well that Google is charging content creators way, way over their costs, even if they qualify for the more lucrative partner programs (most don’t - the long tail - and those who do are the better off YouTubers), exploiting their monopoly position to extract money to an unfair extent from both content creators and advertisers.

      So, I do think it’s weird that you defend one of the richest and financially exploitative corporations on the planet and all your criticism is for me for skipping the annoying and repetative ads and not for the exploitative monopoly corporation.

        • davidagain@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          59 minutes ago

          The content creators make content using which YouTube/Google earns vast sums of money in advertising. They top slice most of the money for themselves and forward very little of it to the people who worked to create it, so in that sense they change the content creators. They’re one of the most profitable companies on the globe. Where does that profit come from? It comes from underpaying content providers. Still don’t know why you’re defending them. They dropped the “don’t be evil” plan and they meant it.