• Kitathalla@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Slight myth there. It was not the intended purpose, but a sort of happy accident. The original patent stated it was a perfect, never damaging thing. See here and the reply here.

    • evergreen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Correct. The original patent makes no reference to any sort of cam out / torque limiting feature.