• thisfro@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    TBH, I’m not surprised. Linus stance on unions is really weird… My interest in LTTs videos has anyway declined in the last time, maybe I’ll take a break and hope they really change some things.

    Props to Madison for speaking out about this!

    • Aussie_Damo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      101
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Been a union member at my workplace for 20years, they only give a shit about pay increases for the workers and Linus pays his workers above minimum wage which is what the union would ask for.

      In this economic climate no one will strike for just one person when it’s those members that are part of the problem.

      Unions aren’t what they used to be and shouldn’t be treated as such.

      • CoderKat@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your union sucks then. Unions have done all sorts of things besides get more pay. They fight for benefits like vacation and sick time, make sure you can’t be fired without cause, ensure good work/life balance, make your job physically safe, and help bad management be held accountable.

        Striking isn’t the only tool in a union’s répertoire. They’ll also do things like help pay for lawyers to fund legal action (hard to do as an individual) and negotiate on your behalf. Most people don’t want to be negotiators (especially the most vulnerable) The union does that undesirable work for you and can often hire experts to do it.

        Work to rule is an alternative to striking that is similar but keeps you working. That’s doing exactly what your contract says and nothing more (eg, bus drivers have done it by not collecting fares, but still driving their routes; teachers have done it by only teachong their classes without doing any extra coaching or supervision on the side). And since your comment suggests that people won’t strike because they can’t go without pay, they can also pay you for the duration of a strike.

        • Aussie_Damo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I know your paid for a strike but not at full pay and people are stupid and live paycheck to paycheck.

          In our industry (mining) the government is alot more strict then the union ever is about safety or the government will remove the mining lease and shit the place down (been done to other pits in the area).

          We work a rotating roster that the company sent to the union during EA talks and they said yeah that’s fine without consulting the workforce, and it’s been that way since and trying to get the older guys to change to a better roster is a nightmare.

          Sick leave and vacation time is government mandated.

          You might live in a destopian country with a shitty government but our unions ride the arse of the governments country wide employment mandates and then say they do alot.

      • thisfro@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Unions aren’t what they used to be I don’t know a lot about unions in the US/Canada, but you’re probably right

        But I also think it depends on your union, right?

        Still better a weak union than no union at all

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It also depends on the country they’re in, union culture is still stronger in Canada vs the USA… Heck, labor laws exist everywhere in Canada, just that is a step ahead of the US…

      • stillwater@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unions still have a lot more upside than downside and should be treated as such.

        • Aussie_Damo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not going to put one union on a pedestal for the sake of other unions as there is alot of shitty unions out there.

          • stillwater@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            On the flipside, you also shouldn’t use one bad union to drag down the concept of unions in general.

            • Aussie_Damo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I never stated I wasonly ever in one union I only stated I have been a union member for near 20years. There has been 3 different unions at my workplace and this 3rd union isn’t any better then the other 2.

              Yes unions have gotten workplaces alot better over the last 100 years, but in the last 15years governments have stripped union powers effectiveness. In Australia most of the benifits unions have gotten have been put into law making 1/2 - 3/4 of what they do not anything different to legal requirements making them only good for pay increases and then calling them “benefits for the employees” and in our case in our last EA agreement it was extremely sub par us members forced the union to go back 3 times for a 2% pay increase per year over 5 years.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re the union, it’s not separate from the workers, it is the workers. Not happy with what the union is doing? Get involved.