• ddplf@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Wait, since when it had not been? Or are you telling me that vastly the fastest growing platform in history with multiple payment gates (subscriptions, pay per token, licensing etc.) was not profitable for some reason?

    • sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      6 days ago

      Not sure if you are joking but… it does not appear to be making anywhere near the amount of money that has been invested in it.

      It costs a stupendous amount of money to develop the models, to train them, to rent out or just buy the hardware needed to do this, to pay for the electrical power to do this.

      • ddplf@szmer.info
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        6 days ago

        Not joking, I’m just underinformed

        Now that I think of it, yeah, it makes absolute sense. It’s not a stable income OpenAI is based on, but rather the endless wagons of money from hyped up sponsors. Very much unsustainable.

        • The Assman@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          the endless wagons of money from hyped up sponsors

          For the record, that describes almost every big software company in the last 30 years.

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        It isn’t even close to making a profit. They are bleeding billions per year with no obvious path to breaking even, let alone profiting enough to justify their enormous valuation. It’s very much a bubble and I look forward to the day it pops.

        Edit: if you want a lengthy read on the subject https://www.wheresyoured.at/oai-business/

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          To be fair, if I had an option to effectively invest in Google circa 2004 in 2024 I would toss some spare money at it, and that’s basically what OpenAI is offering at this moment. They’ve established themselves, shown strong leadership and established strong relationships with major companies. They’re a leader in a particular product segment and while they could falter and fail, there’s enough momentum that they’re more likely to be acquired than to actually fail, plus they’re swimming in extremely uncharted waters so there’s plenty of opportunities for them to both greatly improve ongoing operational efficiency and to create new products with new markets, much like where Google was in 2004

      • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        The cost is to the whole world, because they consume enormous amounts of energy and produce essentially nothing. Like bitcoin miners.

        • TheDoctor [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          6 days ago

          Worse than Bitcoin miners, AI seems to have the wholethroated support of capital (rather than a single faction), who see it as the next big form of automation

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          AI at least provides a clear product that can be a helpful workforce multiplier, whereas Bitcoin provided an unprotected alternative to traditional markets with none of the safeguards nor legal precedents of traditional markets, so it’s only led to illegal activities piled upon illegal activities

    • facow [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      Or are you telling me that vastly the fastest growing platform in history with multiple payment gates (subscriptions, pay per token, licensing etc.) was not profitable

      Are you not aware that 99 times out of 100 if you see a tech company rapidly growing it’s completely unprofitable and not even attempting to be profitable yet? It’s called blitzscaling and is pretty clearly what openai is attempting. Like if you see a tech company quickly growing you should be assuming it’s unprofitable until proven otherwise not the opposite lol.

      • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        They should ask ChatGPT hoe to make OpenAI profitable. I’m sure the answer will make them take off.