• Lazycog@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I feel so hopeless, so pissed, all these news and how these corporations are destroying open web. I really had hope with new generations being more tech savvy and more online would push for openness of web, instead I’ve come to realize that new generations are really into apps and not going beyond that, not interested in deeper look into software and tech - as long as the gadget works and no matter any subscription cost or microtransactions or surveillance.

    I try to be hopeful, but damn it is hard to stay optimistic. I’ve been trying little by little to push friends and family in a nice way into using Firefox, alternatives to big corporate software and so on, but I understand it takes too much effort for someone who is not really interested in these things. But I will be advocate of open web forever myself.

    Edit: okay unfair to expect anything from new generations, and of course there are more tech savvy people than there probably use to be, but had hoped for a huge change in that demographic.

    • sab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t believe I hadn’t heard of this.

      Sony BMG initially denied that the rootkits were harmful. It then released an uninstaller for one of the programs that merely made the program’s files invisible while also installing additional software that could not be easily removed.

      And then they just paid some settlements, recalled some CDs, and continued to operate as if nothing has happened. Bloody hell.

    • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just something funny: First time I donated to archive.org my bank blocked my card due to being a “suspicious payment”.
      I had to physically go to the bank because due to security reasons I couldn’t unblock it in internet banking.
      The high security looked like this:
      “Hello. You blocked my card due to suspicious payment.”
      “OK, what’s your name”
      “[name]”
      “I see. Did you make that payment?”
      “Yes.”
      “OK, I’ll send an e-mail to management. It should be unblocked in a few hours. Have a nice day.”
      “Bye.”

      They didn’t want to see my ID card, not even the debit card. Nor sign anything. Just and only hear my name. “Security”.

  • dreamon86@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The lawsuit said the recordings are all available on authorized streaming services and “face no danger of being lost, forgotten, or destroyed.”

    Yeah right, they all are poorly done digital remasters, edited versions and/or re-recordings. Funny how the record labels are the ones whose destroying their own music.

    Not every track in their original form is available on streaming services, like you can’t stream the original “Set Adrift on Memory Bliss” by P.M. Dawn because all you can get is a cheap re-recording with a different vocalist.

    • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. Recordings of the song being available ≠ original recordings of the song being available.

      It’s like if I demolished the Eiffel tower, and then said the Blackpool tower’s still around so you can’t archive any photos of it