• slaacaa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    There is also just tiny graphic improvements now, so for most people, 5 years old games look similar to what we have now

    • Cossty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I would even go lower than that. If you showed me Prey 2017 or even Alien Isolation 2014, and told me they came out today. I would probably believe you.

      • ignism@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        The remasters coming out now is such bullshit, I mean Horizon Zero Down… are you kidding me?

        • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I was playing the original not too long ago, and they freaking “updated” it with ai upscaling. It looks like absolute trash. I couldn’t figure out how to get rid of it.
          Why would you do that and also remaster it?

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      And that the requirements for those minimal improvements are vast. If you need to pull down 200GB for a minor graphical upgrade, that’s just not really worth it compared to an older game that is a bit graphically worse, but is both smaller, and runs better on newer hardware.

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You can sort of tell by the whole 4k (or even 8k), 144Hz stuff that opportunities for real improvements have been running out for a while.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Which is why they were ignored for a decade or two despite game engines easily achieving those FPS numbers and were pulled out exactly when the hardware vendors ran out of any other arguments to convince people to replace their existing screens and GPUs?

          • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Maybe you’re only seeing the marketing now, probably because the customer base that would care about it are finally in large enough numbers due to the business around eSports, but higher frame rates give you better response times, and we’ve known this for a very long time. In my world, in fighting games, the games only draw at 60 FPS usually, but they can run at a 120 Hz or 144 Hz mode so that they can poll for inputs more frequently, which makes the games feel better to play. Resolution ought to have a tangible impact in FPS games as well.