• utopiah@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is the market place, brah.

      Free market capitalism

      then talk about subsidies or non capitalist country controlling the currency, markets, VCs, etc.

      What does that even mean?

    • gomp@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If the US or EU want to keep up, they can sunbsidize EV manufacturing to the same degree

      You can’t allow dumping-inducing subsidies without also allowing defensive tariffs, otherwise the richer and more authoritarian countries, which have greater capacity for subsidies and greater ability to concentrate them in specific sectors, will easily kill foreign competition and establish monopolies.

      The marketplace brah is a place where, without regulations that maintain a degree of fairness, the rich kills the poor, competition dies off, and consumers are drained to their last cent.

      Just think of it: competition is when different actors fight it off and it ends the moment one of the contenders wins.
      If you want the fight to go on forever, you don’t want an unregulated market.

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      I feel like we would need to utterly destroy the working class to the point that cheap Chinese EVs would become expensive if we were to compete at the same level. I could be wrong, but how many of the chinese workers are driving brand new evs?

      • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Western manufacturing tends to be much more automation heavy. Chinese manufactures don’t bother with buying a $100k machine that can make a car part when they can just hire 10 guys at $10k/yr to make that same part with a $50 drill press and some hand files.

        It’s not that it all strictly balances out, but if we actually gave a shit we could potentially be cost competitive for a lot of price brackets, especially given the costs to move whole ass cars across the Pacific.

        Bear in mind these sub $10k Chinese EVs are not something US consumers would really be interested in buying, they are basically tiny car shaped golf carts with extremely minimalist feature sets. Think ‘no audio system at’ all type interiors.

        • buzz86us@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah I find it a ridiculous parallel I recently saw an article that put a number on Chinese EV subsidies and it seemed extremely low compared to the barrels of money we’ve been giving the oil companies.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        Last I checked US prints money like there’s no tomorrow for shit like wars, but as soon as it comes to subsidizing something actually useful all of a sudden the concern trolling starts.