Some 400 rockets were launched onto Israel on Tuesday night by Iran, The Jerusalem Post understands, following rocket alert sirens that blared throughout the country.

So far, 4 people were reportedly killed during the aerial attacks, and there have been two direct hits, one of which was in Tel Aviv.

Iran launched the wave of attacks after the IDF announced on Monday night that it had begun limited ground operations in Lebanon.

  • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Would you have either side capitulate? Would you come to the aid of a side that was attacked? When would you begin intervening?

      • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Great fantasy world you live in.

        So if somebody does kill someone, we should not hold them accountable?

        Or the victims should not seek justice, should not retaliate? Should wait for someone else to seek justice for them? When would you find yourself willing to intervene?

        You don’t support yourself or come off as rational, and can only plug your ears, bury your head in the sand and ignore the world we live in.

        My point is you’re ignorant or lying in bad faith.

        • NineMileTower@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Whoa, chill out. If you think I’m wrong for saying killing people is wrong, you need help. You could slice me limb from limb, but you can’t stop violence with more violence.

          If violence worked, why has this area been warring for so long?

      • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        So, Warsaw ghetto uprising during WW2 when subjugated poles rose up and began killing their nazi prison guards. You would call this a both sides is wrong situation?

        And if not, I see no reason for you not to consider the palastinians with the same ideals as that of the poles.

        And if so, I respect your pacifism.

        • NineMileTower@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Why do I have to choose sides to believe that killing people is wrong?

          I see your point with WWII, but that’s not this situation. I would personally never kill anyone, it’s against my ideals. No fire burns that hot inside me.

          • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I get that, like I said, I respect the pacifism, but can you at least not accept the validity of self defence in the face of genocide? Even if you were to accept that you yourself never could bring yourself to that? I took don’t believe I could kill a person over it, but I do not blame those who have been pushed to that point of that makes sense