I’m having my comments I made the past few days receive zero engagements. It’s not just me losing the early bird lottery too; my replies to a highly engaged comment has zero likes, while several comments immediately after me has double digits. It’s nothing incendiary at all, just normal people’s comments. But something just tripped the enigmatic AI and thenceforth I’m shadow banned.

Why you should know this?

Because YouTube is being a thought police between creators and their communities. It feels to me like 99.999% of creators on YouTube have no idea that this is happening, that honest to goodness people’s engagements are never going to reach them on the platform; they’re being silently silenced, by an AI that is figuratively a black box.

Look at this screenshot. If that’s not damning evidence you tell me what is.

Imgur

The comment is straight up gone when viewing with a logged out tab. I’m definitely 100% shadow banned right now.

      • echo64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        youtube doesn’t actually care if you comment, “engagement” is through sharing, and watching. that’s all youtube cares about for engagement. how many watch hours, how many adverts, how many click throughs on those adverts.

        also literally every large social network has shadow bans, it’s the only successful way to deal with unwanted elements. if you tell the unwanted element that they are banned, then they just go make a new account.

        • ruk_n_rul@monyet.ccOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          “I only watch trashy scumbag creators and not nice ones who actually struggles when engagements really fluctuates on a whim. I also have never been on the other side to emphatize with them.”

          It’s like Reddit. If you only consume trash the algo gives you you’re not using it right.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then you would not comment on their videos, and the whole thought of “supporting” them via watching their videos is questionable but at least there’s some direct, material, merit to that.

      • Pratai@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Commenting isn’t support. Not sure if you know that. see, I’m commenting on your post- this is not support.

      • Pratai@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You realize that commenting on lemmy isn’t the same the as commenting on YouTube, right?

          • Pratai@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            How is lemmy different from YouTube? Seriously? If you can’t tell the difference, there’s no way I can help you.

            • phillaholic@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s not an answer.

              The whole point of lemmy is to be decentralized and made up of different instances with different rules. You are a lemmy.ca user talking to a lemm.we used on a lemmy.world topic. Some instances are fully of toxic shit, some aren’t. If you’re calling YouTube comments garbage, there’s garbage to be had in the fediverse too. Acting like someone’s dumb for caring about YouTube comments while posting on lemmy is also dumb. Let people care about what they want to care about.

  • kep@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    This was a hard post to read.

    You’re not shadowbanned from YouTube. The creator you’re commenting on has simply “hid” you from their channel. Which ironically is a shadowban, just on a creator level.

    The level of panic and outrage you’ve displayed here despite not having a clue as to how the mechanic you’re discussing works is remarkable.

  • Hyperreality@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    More generally, it’s an important reminder for content creators that their entire youtube career is built on quick sand.

    You can be earning a decent living one day, the next day youtube can block your account or remove monetisation for no valid reason, and you’re shit out of luck.

    I mean, if you’re making a lot of money on youtube, power to you. But you should be saving as much as possible for that day and have a back-up plan. It may never come, it may come tomorrow.

    I cringed when one creator mentioned giving up on her degree to focus on youtube. I mean, sure she’s making bank right now. But who knows how long that’ll last.

    • BrerChicken @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I cringed when one creator mentioned giving up on her degree to focus on youtube. I mean, sure she’s making bank right now. But who knows how long that’ll last.

      Unlike their YT career, that degree course will probably be there in five years. It’ll be more expensive, but it’s not gone forever or anything like that. For some opportunities you really have to strike while the iron is hot. For the record, I’m a HS teacher and I’ve had the “so you want to be a YouTuber for a living” conversation with countless students over the years, including with my own child. But for someone who’s starting to get some traction, and wants to take time off of school to see where it leads them, I think it’s an understandable move.

  • Sagrotan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    IMO at least the educational content of YouTube shouldn’t be in private have entirely, too important today.

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    AITA for thinking shadowbanning - as a concept - is actually a good thing?

    It allows a sort of ban-on-probation. A way to isolate and observe in isolation whether someone exitibits ban-worthy behavior, while already protecting others from said behavior.

    Yes, often banning would be preferrable. But I can also see why immediately going to hard ban is not warranted in many cases. Not everyone is an Alex Jones or a Donald Trump.

    I can also say from work that there can be a variety of reasons that this happens that aren’t shadow bans. Could be fresh accounts, could be distinct databases that for performance reasons cannot fully interact and the geo-separation is buggy, could be language issues causing bugs, could be a host of things. Difficult to say, more so from a single instance.

    • TheEntity@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can see where you are coming from, though I must disagree with the implementation of this system. Firstly, it’s applying a de facto punishment without ever informing the target about them being punished in the first place. For all we know they might not even be aware they should refrain from certain behaviors. Secondly, they either did deserve a punishment or they didn’t. It doesn’t need to be a “ban or not ban” situation, I’m all for more nuance (a warning, a short-term ban, you get the idea), but we shouldn’t just put anyone on probation just in case, just to observe them in isolation first.

      • PrinzKasper@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Shadow Banning is very useful for spam bots. If you let them know they’re banned, they’ll just open a new account. But if YouTube keeps accepting their comments with a smile on its face before immediately tossing those comments into the shredder, it’ll take some time before the bot figures out what’s going on.

      • amigan@lemmy.dynatron.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’re not talking about habeas corpus, we’re talking about the dubious ability to post on a private website’s comments section that has been widely regarded as a cesspool for over a decade. As someone else in this thread pointed out, this is being taken too seriously.

    • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s an age old system that was called “cave the trolls” at first. If you let a problematic user know he is banned, he will simply create a new account.

      Isolating the troll however frees up moderator time spending, as it will usually take a good while for the person to realize he is in fact isolated.

      They should add dummy upvotes and AI generate replies to these troll’s comments too. That would make it even harder to realize.

  • TimeMuncher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Happening to one of my accounts from years. I don’t know which YT mod has a beef with me, but all the comments i make using that account get deleted in a minute on any channel. So i stopped using YT and use newpipe only. I don’t even have the YT app on my phone.

  • ruk_n_rul@monyet.ccOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is coming out of my orifice but I think this also affects creators in that once people like myself know we’re shadow banned we will not be posting comments because, you know, what’s the point? And that is a deduction in engagement, and reductions in engagement affects the creators in visibility in equally vague ways (because opaque black box ML-AIs are driving both of these actions).