TehBamski@lemmy.world to Atheism@lemmy.ml · 9 months agoBook Clubi.imgur.comimagemessage-square156fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageBook Clubi.imgur.comTehBamski@lemmy.world to Atheism@lemmy.ml · 9 months agomessage-square156fedilink
minus-squareindex@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoI don’t think commenting under a clickbait picture is the best way to have a serious discussion
minus-squareindex@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoI’m pointing it out, same people seem not to realize it.
minus-squareslickgoat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoOh, and that’s what the other side is pursuing - a serious discussion? Spare us. The other side is out for blood. No discussion is detailed in Project 2025.
minus-squareindex@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoI’m not sure what you are talking about is this post related to US politics?
minus-squareslickgoat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoIs US politics not related to this post? I mean, in any way?
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoIf we swap the word “bible” for “lawbook” does your opinion change?
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 months agoIf we had it all active laws in one book, that would be a huge step in the right direction.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoAgreed. “Ignorance of the law is not an excuse” is currently impossible to correct.
minus-squareNuke_the_whales@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoYou can’t have a serious discussion with a person who follows a millennia old book
minus-squareindex@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoYou sound like someone who hasn’t read or study much
I don’t think commenting under a clickbait picture is the best way to have a serious discussion
Then why did you do it?
I’m pointing it out, same people seem not to realize it.
Oh, and that’s what the other side is pursuing - a serious discussion?
Spare us. The other side is out for blood. No discussion is detailed in Project 2025.
I’m not sure what you are talking about is this post related to US politics?
Yes.
Is US politics not related to this post? I mean, in any way?
If we swap the word “bible” for “lawbook” does your opinion change?
If we had it all active laws in one book, that would be a huge step in the right direction.
Agreed. “Ignorance of the law is not an excuse” is currently impossible to correct.
You can’t have a serious discussion with a person who follows a millennia old book
You sound like someone who hasn’t read or study much
Studied*
Ironic. 🤣🖕🏽