• Auzy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I disagree with a lot of coverage. Public talking is hard and everyone has had a brainfart before.

    Trump wanted everyone to know he was racist… It was his only clear policy

    If you listen to the actual words, Biden had answers. He might not have been as vocal (which could have been fixed with a mic adjustment).

    But it’s easy to win a debate if you constantly lie. You can’t get onto the offensive, because Trump has the advantage that he can make up bullshit, and claim bullshit. He doesn’t even need to think about policies.

    It’s like arguing on Facebook. Talking on behalf of everyone and claiming that “nobody agrees” can only be disputed with facts.

    As others have said, the format was an issue that benefits Trump. CNN should have fact checked on the spot

  • Storksforlegs@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    It depends if you think lying is a big deal. If you don’t think brazenly lying is a big deal what is wrong with you?

    • Auzy@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Thats the best way of putting it…

      He isn’t even trying to hide it anymore. In fact, I’d go as far as to say, he’s possibly far beyond the point of even knowing he’s lying anymore. He’s either literally delusional, or he’s relying on 3rd party info exclusively from places like Fox News without performing any type of validation and is gullible.

  • coffeetest@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    It wasn’t a debate in that format, it was a performance and both did poorly. Media will “rate” it like a reality TV show and reasonable people should just pass on that.

  • Kwakigra@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    I would like to see this poll again with “no one” as an option. No one won anything at this debate. Anyone pleased by Trump’s performance would have been pleased no matter what, and everyone else is horrified.

  • Truck_kun@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I wouldn’t say Trump won the debate, or that it strengthened his position.

    More the debate weakened Biden’s position strictly in regards to people’s view on his age and health.

    Trump still said some pretty awful things. He lied plenty, but some of those awful things he took credit for, and if Biden was on his game that night, he would have in the past at least, demolished Trump. Problem being he missed those openings, and sometimes changed topics mid sentence from a strong point, to topics that people see as Biden’s weak points. (like abortion -> immigration)

    Biden’s biggest enemy at this debate were unforced errors. Based on his performance at his rally the following day, and during past state of the unions when MTG and others are heckling him, he was clearly off his game, and I can only wonder what the debate would have been like if it was in the morning/afternoon instead of of late at night (or some other condition that got him back on his game).

    It’s great his performance improved so much the next day, but that won’t be seen by many people. The debate was seen by millions, including many that normally wouldn’t be reached. This was his opportunity, and he sort of blew it. Reaching those people in another form with the modern media environment and media consumption will be difficult.

    If Biden continues to run, those who consider abortion, democracy/avoiding fascism, or freedom a top issue, will still vote for him. I will still vote for him.

    If he steps down, and Gavin Newsom steps in as the democratic candidate, I’ll vote for him. (granted he isn’t part of the Primary, and there are pledged delegates for others, but those people have either already dropped out, or would get crushed by Trump).