The new word won’t use any of the letter you’ve already ruled out (so if you guess “doors”, for example, the new word won’t have d, o, r, or s).

I know this isn’t exactly a new game, but I thought I’d share it because it is, as the name implies, absurd.

    • indun@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      For some reason, I appreciate that you’re not working towards one specific word from the start but slowly narrowing down the “available words” until one fits.

    • Floppy@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I didn’t notice any difference either, until I realised that this is actually how I play wordle already. My first 2, normally 3 guesses are just covering the space of likely letters with no repeats.

  • key@lemmy.keychat.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gets a bit repetitive unless you use the random guess feature. It being so strict in trying to avoid letters doesn’t help with that. It would be better if it had a bit more smarts and also tried to “keep its options open” by picking answers with many alternatives to switch to. As is it seems more interesting to think about than play.

    At least it doesn’t put ads literally over the keyboard like a certain other game

  • mdwhite999@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s fun for a couple of tries. But I found a set of 3 words that led to the same ends every time

    • jacktherippah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah I’d say that the more words there are, the more information you’ll have to solve other words which makes things easy. I remember trying a 32-word one once and after my 3 starting guesses of choice it was just one word per guess. I think something like Quordle or Octordle would be better.