Business Insider’s reporter and his disastrous experience with GM’s Blazer including the infotainment system:::When the Chevrolet Blazer EV stranded Kevin Williams, a 7-hour drive turned into a 14-hour ordeal.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Someone tell me please why I can’t find an EV with manual door locks and manual windows, rear view mirrors with maybe just one rear-view camera/sensor in a cost-affordable repaceable spot and only a radio. All it needs to be an EV is to be battery/electric powered. Dumping in all the gadgetry just increases complexity, driver distraction, power required to run, and cost of simple repairs.

    • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Because nobody outside an absurdly small niche wants that. They don’t want the current base models and go out and over spend on upgrades.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      Someone tell me please why I can’t find an EV with manual door locks and manual windows, rear view mirrors with maybe just one rear-view camera/sensor in a cost-affordable repaceable spot and only a radio.

      Counterintuitively, having those alternatives would likely RAISE the cost of that car.

      What is being discovered is that the most expensive component of the car isn’t any specific tech. Its the labor to put it together. Making a design decision which shaves off 60 seconds of human assembly saves millions of dollars, and allows the car to be priced lower.

      Ways to decrease assembly time include making modules with multiple functions together into one unit. This is one reason why your HVAC, infotainment, backup camera are usually one unit in the car. If your requirement of a replaceable radio is introduced, you’ve now doubled the modules that need to go into the car and drastically increased the wiring needed (wire looms are time consuming to assemble).

      Further, your desire for a car with manual door locks and windows is likely not very common. So if this variant of a car were produced it would now have to have a separate logistical change and assembly line. This means more factory space, additional training for workers (there’s that labor again), etc.

    • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Agree, I’ve been driving a bolt for 167,000km and the one thing I wish it was is simpler, like my old Mazda. Buttons and dials.

    • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I still have my 2015 Nissan Leaf, despite cycling through three other EVs since then. And while the Leaf isn’t going to work for a lot of people, it does have manual door locks and in general the electronics are far simpler than other EV models. It’s by far the most reliable EV I’ve driven - never failed to start or experienced a mechanical problem. So I get what you’re saying. Wish there were more simple options out there.

  • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    These software-defined vehicles need way more work and polish put into them IMO, but to be honest I’d rather these companies just give us something basic, simple, and electric that works reliably.

    Toyota did it with the Prius vehicles, particularly the older models, can’t be that hard?

    Also infotainment systems should absolutely not be sharing core vehicle functionality, particularly if they can’t be turned off in the case of this article - only option left to the user is a “deep sleep” that might fix the problem if the vehicle is locked for 5 minutes 🤦‍♂️

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      The worst part about this increase of software use is that it’ll make a mechanically perfectly serviceable car dated and reliant on outside services. Car manufacturers aren’t planning on supporting this software for 10+ years, so one day you’ll find that navigation stops working or something like that.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Toyota did it with the Prius vehicles, particularly the older models, can’t be that hard?

      Its looking like Toyota’s efforts to make the Prius so reliable was to sell more ICE engines. They have no desire to abandon ICE and go whole hog into EVs. Sadly it looks like Honda is the same.

  • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Clearly none of you have ever driven a luxury car and used it’s infotainment. Outside of shitty map updates(which is not a thing on many brands now) many of them are quite good.

    That being said the economy brands should be focusing on basics like screen/touch latency and shitty handling of even basic Android Auto. My Subaru is a dumpster fire and the latest update has made Android Auto handshake a mess. Broke my wifes phone.

    • Ejh3k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      My wife has a Subaru and an iPhone, myself being an android user. It is laughable how bad the android auto fits into her infotainment center. Half the screen is just dead space.

      I know the allure and up-their-own-ass of iPhones makes it seem like such a premium product, but companies really shouldn’t also buy into it and make android auto be a disaster in their vehicles.