Intimate partner violence (IPV) is harmful and prevalent, but leaving abusive partners is often challenging due to investments (e.g., children, shared memories). Identifying warning signs of abuse early on is one prevention strategy to help people avoid abusive long-term relationships. Using university and online samples, the present studies identified warning signs and protective factors that predicted overall, physical, psychological, and sexual abuse cross-sectionally (Study 1) and prospectively over 6 months (Study 2). These studies demonstrated that the number of warning signs a person experienced and the frequency with which they experienced those warning signs predicted overall abuse. Seven warning signs emerged as predictors in both studies (e.g., “My partner acted arrogant or entitled”), suggesting that they are particularly important for identifying potentially abusive relationships. This is the first research to identify warning signs that prospectively predict abuse; findings have implications for IPV prevention efforts in academic and public contexts.
Great, but not much help unless as a society we normalise acting on those warning signs and walking away, instead of so harshly judging and even gaslighting those who do (until after its too late, when it changes to the “why didn’t you leave” victim blaming).
Yeah but we should also have 0 tolerance for these people. It’s a two way street in my opinion.
I’m not sure I understand - who do you mean by “these people” and what exactly is a two way street?
People who give red flags. Their are people who find a few and shrug it off. Like no shit you’re not in a healthy relationship.
Ok, so the first half of your reply is agreeing with me about normalising zero tolerance to red flags, but what is the two way street? Do you mean the people who don’t walk away are the “other” side? Because putting it on them is exactly the kind of victim blaming I mentioned at the end of my reply…
“My partner reacted negatively when I said no to something they wanted.”
This one could use a little more granularity I think. Angry, insulting, and violent I can see, but what about sad, or disappointed; could those not be seen as “negative”? Could even be abuse the other way if one person expects the other to always be cheerful about not letting them have their way.Sad or disappointed could still accurately describe reactions which are intended to be emotionally manipulative. It’s possible that this particular disambiguation could be complicated and may do more to obfuscate meaningful relationships in the data than reveal them.
