• alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    it’s unavoidable to center Elon here but can we just take a step back and appreciate how stupid, bad, and completely antithetical to a usable website this idea is? blocking has been a feature on like everything since phpBB forums because it literally just works. it’s an easy way to curate your experience without escalating and it’s a logical imitation of being able to simply avoid a person in real life. the idea of removing this in favor of nothing but mutes is just goofy as fuck (and if you make muting the new “block”, what’s even the difference between them? people will just use them basically the same way!).

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 years ago

    Wow…

    Is there some kind of tech CEO competition running or something?

    “Who can alienate their user base the fastest”

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 years ago

      There’s a saying, " never attribute to malice what is easily explained by incompetence".

      But we’re quickly reaching the point where it’s no longer easily explained incompetence. Elon is either the most incompetent person in the known universe, which is saying a lot, or he’s doing this on purpose for some reason.

      I’m not into conspiracies, but it’s starting to make more sense if he’s actively trying to tank the stock.

      • Fauxreigner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 years ago

        There’s no stock to tank. You could argue that he’s trying to tank the company, but there are easier ways to do that.

        • baleygr@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 years ago

          You could argue that he’s trying to tank the company

          I’m kinda lost here. What’s his end goal with it?

          • 🇺🇦 seirim @lemmy.pro
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            2 years ago

            Depriving the libs of a favored platform via making it conservative and unruly, and weakening its democratic potential against authoritarian states like Saudi Arabia, is the theory.

        • BobKerman3999@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yes there are, but he’s already with the SEC breathing on his neck for other scams so I guess he wants plausible deniability.

          • Fauxreigner@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 years ago

            There’s no stock or similar security, so the SEC doesn’t care at all. Could be a plausible deniability thing, I just think it’s more likely that he really is that dumb, given the stories about Tesla/SpaceX having teams that basically existed just to control him.

      • generalpotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I mean, 2024 isn’t that far away. It’s pretty clear who he’s pandering to in the name of “free speech” or “townsquare of the internet” or whatever shitty rationalization he uses to explains his nutty behavior.

      • norealme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Once upon a time, long ago, in the very beginning, I liked Twitter as a stream of instant information from all POV. Then Twitter became a haven for bots and a propaganda tool. Is it possible that Musk bought Twitter so that he could take it to the point of absurdity and destroy it?

  • NoxiousPluK@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 years ago

    Fun fact: a block feature is required to be accepted by the Apple AppStore review process. So Twitter will disappear from Apple devices with this change.

    • StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Hmm. Hate to be a downer, but that sounds like there needs to be a way for the service itself to block (ban) users and material, not for users to be able to block other users. So I wouldn’t be too optimistic about Apple’s response…

    • Tekhne@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      Apple’s review process is inconsistent at best. I used to work for an iOS app and it took several years before they blocked our release for not having a report feature on products. Never had the ability to block users, despite the ability to DM people.

      Plus, for an app the size of Twitter, Apple will likely ignore most rules that doesn’t lose them money.

  • Butterbee (She/Her)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 years ago

    So what you’re saying is, if I have a Twitter account and I start blocking many MANY people it costs Elon money? Interesting.

    • vinniep@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 years ago

      Money. Tech was hot and trendy, so VCs were willing to continue pouring cash into a bottomless pit of unprofitable tech platforms, and now they’re not so everyone has to figure out how to make money off of the community. In a surprise to absolutely no one that’s been paying attention, companies filled with people that have never had to be profitable before are really bad at turning their company profitable and instead only manage to light large sections of it on fire. 🤷

    • hglman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 years ago

      Conservative money thinks that they can keep there opposition off balance by smashing social networks . Musk did not launch desatitis campaign out of nowhere.

    • Sploosh the Water@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 years ago

      At the top levels, they are rich and well-connected enough that they don’t have to worry about failing like regular people.

      They can burn millions, billions of dollars and still get out with a fat paycheck, a pat on the back, and another CEO/exec job lined up by one of their many wealthy friends. Either that, or they are “forced” into retirement where they live large for their remaining lives.

      I wish somebody would force me into a wealthy retirement…

  • UngodlyAudrey🏳️‍⚧️@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 years ago

    As a member of a rather vulnerable minority, I had made pretty liberal use of the block feature on Twitter. Of course, I left when Musk took over and switched to Mastodon, but my account’s still there. I didn’t delete it or anything. Might have to now.

  • bizzwell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 years ago

    I really hope platforms like Lemmy and Mastodon take off. Just the idea of no single person with control over how we all communicate and share ideas gives me hope for the future.

    • Helix@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      sadly, Mastodon currently still is pretty centralised around a few very big instances. I hope the Fediverse gets more decentralised…

      • Pigeon@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I think if one of them goes sour it’ll be easier for people migrate to another mastodon instance, and for that instance to grow. When Twitter goes bad, there’s not just a convenient alternative exactly-Twitter-but-run-by-different-people around the corner. But those small Mastodon instances could grow if they had an influx (to a point, and probably better so if the influx was gradual).

        Edit: especially because federation means that the people who move to the new instance can still see and interact with everyone on the old instance, so they can’t be held to the old instance merely by the presence of their friends on that instance. Unless the old instance blocks federation with wherever people start moving to, but still.

      • bizzwell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        What does it take to facilitate this? Do individuals have the ability to help it along, or does it take more resources? I’m new to this but would like to learn.

        • Helix@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          You just have to (encourage others to) register on an instance with less than, say, 1000 active users. I think that’s already taking care of most of the issue.

          • SuitedUpDev@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            You just have to (encourage others to) register on an instance with less than, say, 2000 active users. I think that’s already taking care of most of the issue.

            Yes and another thing that also doesn’t help is that Mastodon currently does not (yet) support migrating over previously posted content. So if you migrate from one server to another, your old profile does show “user migrated to X”, but I think people are a bit afraid to leave their old posts behind.

      • Chewy12@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        In the process of taking off at best. That’s nothing compared to Twitter right now.

    • SynapticOddity@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah! I’m a little sad how resilient these toxic media companies are. Meta, twitter, Reddit, etc are really not good for humanity. But I guess humanity has always been toxic to itself.

      • eccentricengineer@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think a large part of this is just users being complacent. As long as the platform doesn’t completely change, most users will typically just keep trudging along.

        For example if you remember the whole WhatsApp controversy from a little while ago. Pretty much my entire extended family communicated solely through WhatsApp, and they all were promising change, moving to signal, deleting fb and so forth. When the time actually came, everyone made signal accounts, and a few really switched, but to this day everyone still uses WhatsApp.

        I’d guess that as long as people’s “interests” are on the platform, they will continue to use it.

        • SynapticOddity@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Spot on analysis. The convenience of staying must be beat out by the new tool. I remember when myspace was killed when facebook came. The annoyance of everything being customized was beat by facebooks neatness. Finally all my relatives could find the buttons. Apollo was soooo convenient on reddit. I’m hoping he’ll port it to the fediverse, that would be the killer app for me.

      • zinklog@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        With Twitter, situation is different since most celebs are still on it and people generally use it just to see what the popular people are saying. Once (and if) these celebrities join Mastodon, Twitter would start to finall fall.

  • probodyne@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 years ago

    Damnit, I knew I shouldn’t have blocked him. Sorry guys this is my fault, I only had him muted before.

    • androogee (they/she)@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Maybe we can convince him that the chain of events that lead to so many people blocking him is actually what Blockchain means and get him to ban all crypto. This would obviously piss off his cryptobro fans, leading them to mint an NFT of a screenshot of the front page of Twitter and claim that no one else is allowed to use it.

      Thus would ignite the Great Flame War of 2023.

  • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 years ago

    Elongated Muskrat has discovered just how many accounts are blocking him. His ego can’t take that. His FrEeSpEeCh must be heard

    • Wrena of Delpan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m skeptical of this, maybe it’s because he’s worried his fascist followers are slowly falling into an echo chamber cause anyone with more than a few braincells blocks them

      • Sam@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        Nothing makes me cringe harder than the childish nicknames everybody keeps coming up with. Elongated Muskrat isn’t funny or offensive.

  • J_C___ (lemmy.place)@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 years ago

    Let’s be real, he’s doing this because he’s upset about people blocking Twitter blue accounts, this in no way increases server costs or any bull shit like that

    • manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Elon, for all of his smarts, seems to not understand the game theory behind social networks. I get it, we have had the status quo for over a decade, but the fundamental rules are still the same.

      Frankly I’m happy to seem them falling apart and a return to how social was meant to be on the internet.

      • smokinjoecalculus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        That doesn’t make sense. Social media rules aren’t written in stone.

        All forms of communication/media/technology evolve over time. Going backwards is regressive.

        • manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Depends on what going backwards means, from a technical perspective this is fine and more forward than the centralized providers would have you believe. The only step back im seeing is mainly UI and tooling. The bones here are fine and the UX im seeing on Lemmy and Kbin are inline with reddit just a few years ago.

          If having to deal with UX issues is a huge problem the just wait and come back when its more developed, most of what you use in your day-to-day computing is OSS code, if its good enough for your daily work, its good enough for socials.

          • smokinjoecalculus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            You know, maybe I didn’t understand the full meaning of your comment - I assumed you were referring to not having the ability to block a user as a “return to how social was meant to be on the internet”

            • manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              why would I not be able to block a user on the internet? I was able to block them on every system from the beginning. Centralized services will have you think you need thier magic code to do that but we used to do it with clients all the time.

              I still run IMAP email clients with a boat load of personal rules, though I did move the blocks to my server for efficiency. Still its MY server, like im posting to you now from my fediverse instance. If i wanted to block someone here they can be annoying sure but at the end of the day I have many of the same tools i had before, though there might be more cat and mouse. That said nothing stops you from having entirely private instances and since we technically can completely control our servers and clients its entirely possible to have things like one-way servers and nodes that are more picky about what they forward. If the network grows you will see an increased sophistication in management tools.

              • smokinjoecalculus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                But we were talking about Twitter specifically, not any sort of self-hosted platform or personal site.

                I don’t disagree with you, I’m just confused when the discussion moved from Twitter to an anecdote about one’s IMAP email client

              • hyazinthe@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                Recently, here on lemmy, someone explained Usenet in its days, and said that you yourself couldn’t block others, but only ask the ISPs to. Isn’t that “social” without being able to block others?

                Besides, I feel like @[email protected] didn’t want to suggest that you were not able to block others in the past, just stating what he assumed you meant, without evaluating.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Blocking Twitter Blue users is the only way to make threads make sense again after he decided to weight them higher. Any time you open a tweet there’s like 10 Twitter Blue trolls with 3 followers that are sorted above the good comments.

  • Talmir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 years ago

    So he’s run out of engineers that know how to maintain the block feature?

    • Gork@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      QA: “I’m clicking the block button but it isn’t doing anything anymore!”

      Twitter mgmt: “That’s ok, instead of fixing it we’ll just remove the button.”

    • The dogspaw @midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It would be hilarious if when he is out at twitter we got a twitter files dump that showed the devs that maintained block really are all gone and he’s playing it off like this is some new big idea twitter came up with to make money🤣

  • Gerula@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 years ago

    Another great ideea from greatest Genius of our age! Of God how could we live without him until now! /s

    • catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s insane how ludicrous his ideas in particular seem to be, especially with Twitter. This has to be trolling, surely? Or does he not want to allow people to block him?

      • itty53@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        He’s already overridden people blocking him. You still see his posts.

        He’s just trying to make sure it stays useful as a weapon for fascists like himself is all.

      • BobKerman3999@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        He’s mask off now and he wants his very own version of free speech in your face. That means him and his nazi friends will abuse you to no end and if you reply he’ll ban you like the thin skinned bitch he is.

      • FlamingHot@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        If you have your personal “ban from plattform entirely” button, why would you need a block button? Jeez you guys it’s so obvious.

  • DJDarren@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 years ago

    Elon Musk is a gaping, farting anus. I pay as much attention to the sounds from a gaping, farting anus, as I do from him.