Russia Breaks Silence Over China Map Claiming Its Territory

The Russian Foreign Ministry has rejected China’s apparent claim of ownership over a disputed island that has been a source of tension between Moscow and Beijing for decades.

Earlier this week, the Chinese Communist Party mouthpiece Global Times newspaper published the “2023 edition of China’s standard map,” crediting the Ministry of Natural Resources.

The map touches on multiple territorial disputes, among them Bolshoi Ussuriysky Island, which sits at the confluence of the Ussuri and Amur rivers that separate Russia and China. The island is known as Heixiazi, or Black Bear, in Chinese.

On Thursday, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova dismissed any suggestion of reopening the territorial dispute, which she said had been settled by bilateral agreements more than 15 years ago.

“The Russian and Chinese sides adhere to the common position that the border issue between our countries has been finally resolved,” Zakharova said in a statement published on the Foreign Ministry website.

“Its settlement was marked by the ratification in 2005 of the Supplementary Agreement on the Russian-Chinese state border on its eastern part, according to which Bolshoi Ussuriysky Island was divided between the parties.”

“The delimitation and demarcation of our common border has been completed along its entire length (almost 4,300 km [2,670 miles]), including in 2008 on Bolshoi Ussuriysky Island.”

The island has been split between Russian and Chinese control per the bilateral agreements. But China’s newly published official map suggests it claims control of the entire 135-square-mile piece of land.

Zakharova, though, said the “resolution” of the dispute “was the result of many years of efforts by both sides, a reflection of the high level of relations between the two countries, made an important contribution to ensuring security and stability in the region, and is a successful example of resolving border disputes for all countries of the world.”

“Russia and China have repeatedly confirmed the absence of mutual territorial claims, and there is a corresponding provision in the Treaty on Good Neighborliness, Friendship and Cooperation of July 16, 2001,” the spokesperson added

“The parties have an extensive structure of interaction in the field of border cooperation, the Joint Border Commission is functioning effectively, within which all relevant issues are discussed.”

Newsweek has contacted the Chinese Foreign Ministry by email to request comment.

Beijing’s new map has created fresh tensions with several other neighbors. India, Malaysia, Taiwan, and the Philippines have all expressed opposition to the symbolic landgrab.

Chinese officials have been unapologetic. “A correct national map is a symbol of national sovereignty and territorial integrity,” Li Yongchun, a senior resources ministry official, said.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin said publishing the map was “a routine practice in China’s exercise of sovereignty in accordance with the law.” Wang added: “We hope relevant sides can stay objective and calm, and refrain from overinterpreting the issue.”

  • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If this were any other country complaining about illegal land grabbing, I’d be sympathetic to their plight, but Russia is literally in the middle of a war caused by their own illegal land grabbing. They can get fucked

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And they’ve been doing it for years. In the Grand Tour episode where they drove across Georgia they saw a place where Russian soldiers move the barbed wire that marks border in the middle of the night. There was this poor old man weeping because they’d taken his entire farm this way.

      Fuck Putin and fuck Russia for “electing” him.

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The entire country has untreated PTSD from when the Mongols ruled them and they self-medicated with vodka for centuries

          • interolivary@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And funnily (??) Catherine the Great wasn’t Russian, and Peter’s legacy is pretty hotly contested. He was a reformer in many senses but still very Russian; eg. St. Petersburg was built with slave labor by conscripting serfs, an incredible amount of who died in the process

    • Endorkend@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      With the sabotage and drone strikes Ukraine is doing in Russia, safe to say Russia would be 4th.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s russia gonna do? Become the 3rd most powerful army in Russia? (after China, Wagner)

      I mean, if drone strikes count, wouldn’t they be the 4th most powerful Army? (Ukraine, China (no evidence of their strength), Wagner)

  • gk99@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh, Russia is mad that another country is making illegal claim to territory they see as their own?

    Slava Ukraini. Crimea isn’t the only thing Russia’s going to lose now that the entire world knows their military is a husk.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    The island has been split between Russian and Chinese control per the bilateral agreements. But China’s newly published official map suggests it claims control of the entire 135-square-mile piece of land.

    So it sounds like China is placing as much importance on those bilateral agreements as Russia did with Budapest Memorandum recognizing Ukrainian sovereignty and national borders.

    Perhaps there are ethnically Chinese plants an animals on the island needing to be protected by China. /s

  • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    On Thursday, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova dismissed any suggestion of reopening the territorial dispute, which she said had been settled by bilateral agreements more than 15 years ago.

    Strange… I thought Ukraine had similar deals… I wonder what happened to those agreements…?

    Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin said publishing the map was “a routine practice in China’s exercise of sovereignty in accordance with the law.” Wang added: “We hope relevant sides can stay objective and calm, and refrain from overinterpreting the issue.”

    I think the problem is the map is that you can’t over interpret a map. It’s pretty basic and quite clear.

    What people might not get is this is pretty common for the people of China to haggle for everything. They usually will try to start from a position of power and negotiate down.

    They might not understand that they are negotiating with people’s lives though, and people might not appreciate the nuance.

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m always bemused by territorial disputes like this one. To me, it seems like one of the most basic aspects of being a country is defining exactly what your territory is, and being precise about where your borders are. I know I’m oversimplifying, but damn, people.

    • anonionfinelyminced@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Regardless of how “civilized” humans are, borders are just lines on sheets of paper. The real border is where you can place your feet by use (or threat) of violence. The law between nations is the law of the jungle.

  • andallthat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin said publishing the map was “a routine practice in China’s exercise of sovereignty in accordance with the law.” Wang added: “We hope relevant sides can stay objective and calm, and refrain from overinterpreting the issue.”

    I don’t know if a lot of context is lost in translation from Chinese or if China’s diplomatic language is just that weird… An “exercise in sovereignty” that is not to be overinterpreted? Is this saying that they are just putting this out for their internal public but shouldn’t be taken seriously outside of China?

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Earlier this week, the Chinese Communist Party mouthpiece Global Times newspaper published the “2023 edition of China’s standard map,” crediting the Ministry of Natural Resources.

    The map touches on multiple territorial disputes, among them Bolshoi Ussuriysky Island, which sits at the confluence of the Ussuri and Amur rivers that separate Russia and China.

    On Thursday, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova dismissed any suggestion of reopening the territorial dispute, which she said had been settled by bilateral agreements more than 15 years ago.

    “The Russian and Chinese sides adhere to the common position that the border issue between our countries has been finally resolved,” Zakharova said in a statement published on the Foreign Ministry website.

    “Its settlement was marked by the ratification in 2005 of the Supplementary Agreement on the Russian-Chinese state border on its eastern part, according to which Bolshoi Ussuriysky Island was divided between the parties.”

    “Russia and China have repeatedly confirmed the absence of mutual territorial claims, and there is a corresponding provision in the Treaty on Good Neighborliness, Friendship and Cooperation of July 16, 2001,” the spokesperson added


    The original article contains 482 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 62%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • 4vr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Map was intended for people of China, isn’t it? And doesn’t change anything for rest of the world!

    • Staccato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Wait, why is there a passport control here? There’s no national border here on this map.”