• empireOfLove@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Ayo I’m in the screenshot letsa fucking GOOOOOOOOOO-

    For context, Bungiefan_ak has no fewer than 4 alts that I’ve seen (all on different instances with the same username) and has spent his time on [email protected] continuously spamming heavily transphobic, homophobic, and objectifying sexist “memes”. Just about every one of his alts is now banned but I’m sure more will pop up.

    Now, why the fuck he cares so much about pirates at this point, I haven’t a clue…

      • acastcandream@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s easy to be a contrarian when opinions are not something you actually hold, but simply hats to be swapped out or discarded as necessary.

        • FastEddieB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Kid’s probably on the debate team, they live to argue. Good luck figuring out their real opinions though, they might not even have any.

          • acastcandream@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Sadly this is just how many people operate, though I imagine the emphasis on L-D debate and convincing judges certainly contributes to our culture of engaging that way.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I love arguing with people, I’ll even argue points I don’t necessarily believe, but that’s not the same as trolling. The difference is doing it in good faith

        Trolls aren’t trying to convince anyone or engage in debate, they’re in it to russle jimmies, own the libs, or whatever. There’s not really an intellectual aspect to it, it’s arguing on emotion

      • empireOfLove@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Oh. Oh that makes so much more sense. His sad little idea of vengeance is to now attack anything piracy related and get dbzero ostracized from LW lol

      • faintedheart@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Out of curiosity, just someone not supporting trans people or lgbtq are getting banned or they are taking asshole behaviour and spewing hate speech?

        Edit: good fucking world. I am not against lgbtq. I am supporting it. I am a bi curious guy. I am all in for their civil rights. I was asking a question about why that guy was banned. For asshole behaviour or just having a different opinion. I don’t believe just for telling someone doesn’t care about lgbtq is not a reason for ban.

        • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          is “not supporting someone” your newspeak for being asshole? because i am pretty sure that any group of people doesn’t give a flying fuck about you or anyone else not “supporting them”, just let them be and they will be happy.

        • empireOfLove@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Well, there’s a pretty wide spectrum in “not supporting”. Can range between “cool bro, not my thing but you do you just leave me out of it”, which is a rational albeit reserved response… or you could be like Bungiefan, who spams memes calling transgender people pedophiles (multiple times).

        • EremesZorn@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          The guy posts anti-LGBT memes everywhere. He’s one of these losers that likes to use “cuck” in his comments. I’d ban on that alone. Hell, I’d ban anyone for being a Trump supporter or a tankie. Then again, that’s why I’m not a mod, never was, and shouldn’t be.

      • empireOfLove@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Doing the lord’s work. What a shitfest of a modlog, real winner this guy is

        Edit: dear God he keeps MAKING MORE. This dude seriously needs to get a life or something

      • Red@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yeah we banned them on reddthat 2 days ago. I’m glad to see I’m not an outlier. Initially we should a 7 day ban should suffice. But then that user decided to message the admin directly and insult them.

        Probably the fastest way to get your account banned.

        Edit: The message in question. 👀 (Attempted spoiler open if you dare)

        ! Screenshot_20230816-204901!<

        • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I believe the spoiler tag is the following on Lemmy

          ::: spoiler spoiler label
          sh*t to hide
          :::
          
          spoiler label

          sh*t to hide

      • acastcandream@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        To be fair, if you still play Destiny, you basically have to dupe yourself into thinking they aren’t as terrible as they are with their monetization practices. Otherwise you’d have to admit you have no self-respect.

      • LetsGoBrandon9982@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That would explain why he’s such a snob about piracy on his Reddit subs. For context on Reddit this person (pretty sure they’re the same person) banned me from a sub he moderates (I believe it was r/3dshacks) and he tried to get me banned from r/EmulationOnAndroid and also weirdly enough r/teenagers he failed at getting me banned from them by the way because those subs aren’t anti-piracy bungie stans like he is, simply put they don’t care.

        But yeah he was a real loser, I think he got removed from most of the subs he moderated by Reddit though, and the participation in the protest has all but killed the remaining Sub. From Allmighty powermod to a pathetic whiny troll (though I guess he still was a whiny troll before, he just seemed more respectable from the outside).

    • db2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      The troll doesn’t care, at all. It got banned clearly or it would be trolling here directly, it’s retaliation. Child psychology will tell you everything you’d need to know about that “user”.

      • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        Maybe we shouldn’t feed that troll ?

        I think in that case a shadowban would be the best way to do it. Or an IP ban if that’s possible.

        In any case this is giving him even more reason to keep on harassing people for attention.

        • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          An entire instance just fed the troll, pretty sure the cats out of the bag on this one…

    • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      that guy is the most succesfull troll in history. he single-handedly created havoc that big that russian trollfarm wouldn’t have to be ashamed for and you continue to give him audience. just ban him and move on.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      These are the alts, counts, scores, and ban status my instance is aware of:

           name     |      domain      | banned | posts | comments | post_score | comment_score 
      --------------+------------------+--------+-------+----------+------------+---------------
       Bungiefan_ak | lemmy.world      | t      |     0 |        0 |          0 |             0
       Bungiefan_ak | lemmy.dbzer0.com | t      |     0 |        2 |          0 |           -14
       Bungiefan_ak | startrek.website | t      |     0 |        0 |        -35 |            -4
       Bungiefan_ak | reddthat.com     | t      |     0 |        0 |          0 |             0
       Bungiefan_ak | lemm.ee          | t      |     0 |        7 |          0 |          -119
       Bungiefan_ak | lemdro.id        | f      |     0 |        0 |          0 |           -22
       Bungiefan_ak | geddit.social    | f      |     0 |        0 |          0 |           -30
       Bungiefan_ak | sopuli.xyz       | t      |     0 |        0 |          0 |             0
       Bungiefan_ak | lemmy.ca         | t      |     0 |        0 |          0 |             0
       Bungiefan_ak | sh.itjust.works  | t      |     0 |        7 |          0 |          -287
      
    • Risk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      For context, Bungiefan_ak has no fewer than 4 alts that I’ve seen (all on different instances with the same username)

      I mean, this is one of the benefits of the lemmyverse - using the same username across different instances. It’s not subversive.

      That’s not to lend a defence of this guy - just didn’t want having Lemmy alts presented as a bad thing.

      • Varyag@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        Having Lemmy alts is not a bad thing. Using them to circumvent bans very much is, tho.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      For context, Bungiefan_ak has no fewer than 4 alts that I’ve seen (all on different instances with the same username)

      Spending that much money and time stanning for fucking Bungie of all decaying and bloated and corrupt treat companies is really something. pathetic

      and has spent his time on [email protected] continuously spamming heavily transphobic, homophobic, and objectifying sexist “memes”.

      OF FUCKING COURSE. bridget-pride-stay-mad

    • That Dutch guy@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      How do you people find these alts. I scroll by, like or don’t, but I have no idea if they are related.

      Do you guys have a 7th sense or something?

    • HellAwaits@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      And yet you just yeeted all this attention to the troll, so congrats. You got played.

      letsa fucking GOOOOOOOOOO-

  • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Corporations when some dude steals a copy of a 30 year old movie: 😡

    Corporations when they steal billions from their workers salaries every year: 🤑

    • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Taking money for a 30-year-old movie is pretty much government-assisted stealing, if I’m honest. Copyright in the USA originally had a term of 14 years.

      • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Here’s the thing: copyright term includes the life of the author plus a fixed period. So the works you and I nobodies produce will eventually become public domain after we die. HOWEVER, and this is just my underatanding of the laws and I’m definitely not a lawyer, not big name IPs because they are not registered under the human author, but a corporation that is both a person under the law and effectively immortal. So even if it’s two thousand years after George Lucas dies, Star Wars will still be copyrighted as long as Disney exists, and even if Disney dies, part of the process of corporate “death” is liquidation where they sell their IPs to the next asshole corporation.

        Am I wrong? Please correct me if I am.

        • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Afaik you are not correct. Copyrights for a corporation also have an expiration date.

          Except – The expiration date can be extended by just continuing to use the IP – Ever wondered why movies get remakes/reimaginings every 30 years or so? We meme about them being “Out of ideas”, but really it’s so they can hold down their copyright.

          • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Using an IP doesn’t extend the date at which it becomes public. Movies get remakes etc because they want to make more money. Some movie companies have deals around IP with the original IP owner that revert if they don’t use the IP, but that’s separate from when the IP goes public.

            Sony for example have exclusive movie rights to the Spider-Man IP in perpetuity as long as they release a movie every 5.75 years at most, otherwise it reverts back to Marvel. That’s why they keep rebooting it and releasing sequels no matter how garbage they are - it’s better for them to release a trash movie that bombs than it is to lose the most valuable superhero IP in the world.

          • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Except – The expiration date can be extended by just continuing to use the IP – Ever wondered why movies get remakes/reimaginings every 30 years or so? We meme about them being “Out of ideas”, but really it’s so they can hold down their copyright.

            No, that’s just wrong. At one point, early Marvel contracts had clauses that allowed the movie producer to keep the contract going if they continued to put out movies. When Marvel got big (post-Iron Man), they had been trying to claw back those contracts. That’s why Fox kept putting out an X-Man movie every few years, and Sony kept putting out Spiderman.

            But, that has nothing to do with copyrights, and all of the remakes are just shit that Hollywood does for memberberries.

      • acastcandream@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        See, this is the stuff I was talking about in my other comment. Too many arguments in favor of piracy are these little one off, no context one-liners that sound snappy/true, but lack nuance.

        It’s not that you don’t have a point, but you need to actually tease this out a little more, and also addressed the fact that most people who are pirating are not doing it for that reason. There is always unwillingness by piracy advocates to acknowledge that some people do it just because they want free shit. It’s not a moral stance, it’s not a social movement, it’s not a financial necessity, they just don’t want to pay for it. 

        I definitely don’t ever pirate. I would never use transmission or the pirate bay to acquire what I want. But if I did, which, of course I don’t, I would admit it’s because of a combination of 1) convenience, 2) the ability to deploy where I want it, more specifically 3) so I can put it on my server to stream on my network, and 4) because of fears of the programming being taken down, such as streaming services.

        I would also be lying if I said I wouldn’t do it because I don’t want to spend money on it. That’s just me being honest.

        My point being that whatever your reasoning, I just don’t like when people throw out bullshit excuses or examples that only apply to .001% of people engaging in piracy.

        • mayo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I agree about snippy one liners but I’m also not invested in this topic enough to go deeply into it. Maybe not until someone engages. I just browse lemmy, I share thoughts. I’m just here to hang out. If I want to learn then I read a book. I try not to take this site or myself on this site too seriously. I also like how you responded in somewhat long form. I like that a lot, and I’m hoping one day I can join tildes.net and participate in longer conversations.

          That said, I don’t think it’s a bullshit response and I don’t think I need to elaborate on how subsidies work or how deregulation has siphoned money from the public and given it to private companies. For me, it doesn’t matter why an individual chooses to pirate or how they justify it. I see it as a form of protest and anyone participating in the protest for any reason is doing it for the right reason.

          I think it’s interesting that people jump to the defence of copyright, or question the morality of piracy on the grounds of what damage it might cause to creators and publishers. Tax laws - old (austerity taxes), new (lowered corporate taxes), and proposed (100% inheritance tax) are much more significant than any effect piracy will ever have. This is what we should be debating and arguing about, not with piracy. It’s peanuts.

  • GayTuckerCarlson [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Does anybody have the greentext that goes something like

    Pirate game

    Company loses $60 because it’s theft

    Company regains $60 after deleting game from hard drive

    Pirate one million copies, company bankrupt from massive theft

    Buy insolvent company for cheap

    Delete all game copies, company profitable again

  • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    11 months ago

    yall, this dude tired signing up to my instance a few nights ago. yall wanna see why many communities have registration approvals? see below. warning for nsfw language

    NSFW language

    • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Still laughing at the vast amount of people coming from reddit and expecting only chill people to be on lemmy. Like lemmy users are somehow immune to toxicity.

      It’s less toxic overall but we (or mostly the moderators) will have to fight them all the time.

      At least it will improve the moderation tools which is always a good thing.

      • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        When I realized it was that dude who tried signing up to my instance I lost my shit laughing, if he was screened prior it’s obvious he wouldn’t have gotten in. This is precisely what happens when you focus on growth over organically cultivating a healthy community.

        • UlfKirsten@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I have no proof but I think lemmy.world will be monetized at some point.

          • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            If that is true in any way whatsoever, that is a completely moronic long term goal. Lemmy devs themselves have encouraged instances who do such a thing to defederate. I don’t see how realistically advertising or monetization would be done not only without immense privacy concerns that would likely affect the rest of the fediverse but without major protests and mass defederation. The backlash against it would be immense, not just on lemmy but across the fediverse itself.

            • SineNomineAnonymous@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              The lemmy.world admins are pretty much disgruntled power tripping redditors. They aren’t thinking that far ahead. They’re definitely going to go for the dumbest move they can possibly pull off and count on their reddit users to argue in favour of it as a “reasonable, sensible choice after all”.

      • Aimhere@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Lemmy is like every social medium since the dawn of time: a cross-section of humanity… the good, the bad, and the ugly.

    • LetsGoBrandon9982@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      That is legitimately one of the most disgusting things I’ve read, what is wrong with this person, why would he write that as an application.

      • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It came after I was arguing with weirdo antisemites in c/atheistmemes so I assume it was because of that but I have no idea and don’t really care to know that much

        • LetsGoBrandon9982@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          At least he was stopped at the registration level, it likely wouldn’t have been pretty if he was allowed to run wild there like he did on other places.

  • acastcandream@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think people who are pro-piracy tend to be a little dogmatic in the wrong direction, refusing to exercise their imagination and contemplating situations where people can be legitimately hurt financially by their actions. However, most of the arguments are pretty sound, and I can’t imagine working that hard making new accounts just to argue in favor of movie/record studios that have exploited artists for as long as they have existed.

    The “filthy” line was just funny to me lol

    • Diminish4036@noworriesto.day
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think people who are pro-piracy tend to be a little dogmatic in the wrong direction, refusing to exercise their imagination or contemplate situations where people can be legitimately hurt financially or otherwise by their actions.

      That’s not been my experience. I always see people advocating for paying for games/media when it comes from indie devs etc. And there is a difference between piracy and outright theft of artwork which is then profited from, I.e. a company steals small artists work and puts it on t-shirts - very few “pro-piracy” people, if any at all, are advocating for that.

      At the end of the day, pirates do it because they either have very little money or they’re smart and want to retain the money they have. Then there are anti-copyright people, which is cool too.

      Then there are the people who don’t really know what’s going on but claim some moral standing surrounding piracy. I can actually feel them coming, fuck…

      • acastcandream@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

         Well that has often been my experience, but I’m not going to pretend that my experience as everyone is.

        For instance, I see a lot of really ridiculous arguments claiming it’s for archiving.” First of all, they do not follow archival procedures. Second, they are not working with any known archiving organizations. Thirdly, they are not using what they have. “archived” in any manner that could be considered “for the public good.“ Unless you want to count seeding it back out, but that argument can become pretty recursive pretty quickly. 

        It also just so happens they are archiving mostly - if not entirely - the games they want to play, the shows they want to watch, and the movies they want to watch. It’s awfully curious how much the venn diagram of “archiving for the public good” and “what I want to enjoy” resembles a circle lol.

        My point being, there are arguments in favor of piracy, most of which i agree with. But I see a lot of disingenuous ones from people who are clearly just doing it because they feel entitled to the media. I would rather they were just honest about their intentions instead of feeding me nonsense talking points that even they don’t believe. Otherwise it just reeks of justifying their actions (poorly) instead of just saying “I have nothing to justify.”

        • DreamDrifter@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          You have a point, but it’s kind of like people who resist all gun control due to the second amendment despite the shootings going on

          Yeah, if life continues on as-is, the argument has little merit. On the other hand, in the case of the second amendment, we have fascists making a credible move for control.

          In the case of archiving DRM content, if we have a cataclysm (which seems increasingly likely), then having drm-free, ideally unencrypted, content sitting on random hard drives might end up making an enormous difference in a lot of lives

          Or even without a cataclysm, just general enshittification might end up destroying the gaming and media industries - passed around old games might be the seed for the next generation of tech-heads. I started my path by jailbreaking my PSP so I could use custom web browsers and homebrew - spreading these after the Internet is locked down by efforts like kosa and WEI (and whatever comes next) might be the spark that motivates the next generation

    • ninpnin@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      When it comes to art, there’s always somebody who doesn’t make it financially. Too few sold albums, too few downloads, too little merch sold. Some artists are always going to struggle and barely stay afloat making art, while the ones doing marinally worse are gonna quit and do something else.

      The number of these people for whom piracy - or any other small loss of revenue for that matter - tips the scale doesn’t depend on how many people pirate stuff.

      The actual difference piracy makes is the 0.2% (or whatever) dent in revenue which then means ~ 0.2% of potential artists end up working in other industries.

      • acastcandream@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        When deciding whether or not use someone’s art without their permission, it behooves one to consider the ethics. Whether you come to a different conclusion than I do is whatever, but not every case is exactly the same, and to dismiss the people on the other side of the equation with made-up numbers pulled from thin air is not the proper way to go about it.

    • HaloMasyerChief@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      They never think on the people they affect. They just want free things all the time claiming imaginary problems like the government and companies steal from them, like bro, that’s just how capitalism works if you don’t like it go to rusia, Venezuela and see how they’re doing

      • acastcandream@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        My feelings are far more nuanced than this. Suffice to say I do not agree with you when you paint with such broad strokes.

        Yes some people just want free shit, I think most people would acknowledge that. But when you get too boilerplate about piracy and don’t explore the topic, you’re no better than those who make up disingenuous reasons for why they never need to consider what they are pirating and who it may impact.

        • HaloMasyerChief@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Someone posted on another comment, the guy in the screenshot takes always the same name for his accounts. I just agree with him

  • Gsus4@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Still, one of the key aspects of piracy is discreteness and these debates and notoriety don’t help with that. Piracy does not look for you, you look for it, if you know how to find out how. The last thing I want is for every single Lemmy thread about netflix to have a top comment saying piracy is better than streaming.

  • GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    Lmao this is the guy that first lead to them banning the communities right?

    Love that lemmy.world seems to be making their moderation strategy based off of a troll with at least 4 alts…

      • DavyJones@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Made them show their true face and flaws. Who knows, maybe the troll is even someone from their staff on an alt.

      • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        He didn’t fool anyone, he just seems to have caught them acting like hypocrites and made them either put up or shut up. If you want to enforce rules, you need to actually enforce the rules. If discussions of illegal things is against the rules that you made, then clearly an entire community built around illegal piracy is against the rules. Him pointing that out is a big-brain move that you would hope the admins would have gone “ah you got us. We’ll change that rule to not be so restrictive”, but instead they went “well shit, we’ll remove it instead of changing our stupid rules”.

  • Flower of Anarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    What a fucking loser crying about intellectual property. Love live piracy and anarchy. Be gay do crime! 🏴 🏴‍☠️ 🏳️‍🌈 🏳️‍⚧️ yo ho ho 🦜 nikopirate custom emoji

    • doctor_sociology [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      its actually amazing how internet culture went from this anarcho-utopianism where information just wants to be free, maaan to reddit style races to the normie bottom. who gives a shit about intellectual property other than bowtie spinning economist dickheads and the beltway lanyard class?

      • abraxas@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        In fairness, I think it’s because the tech barrier of entry went down, WAYYY down. “Free Data” is an easy sell to people who were dialing into usenet in the 90’s, and us stupid ameteur hackers who would break into systems like they were puzzles because we thought it was cool and the maximum penalty was a fine and community service (the good old days, we all did it at least once and thought we were Zero Cool… unless we thought Zero Cool was lame, whatever). A lot of the people who think IP jives well with the internet were the ones who looked at me weird when I said I had online friends circa 2000, and who couldn’t understand how I couldn’t make some party because I “had to spend Saturday hanging out on IRC for my D&D campaign”

        Even more technical folks now, they just never lived what made the internet beautiful when it was smaller. Back when “FOSS” was “Free as in Beer” and fuck that Richard Stallman with his “free as in speech” bullshit. They don’t remember how this dark storm of people’s hobbies turning into other people’s IP, people like Bill Gates stealing the foundations of technology to build his empire (for all the good he does now, he was truly evil to his core).

        Ok, old-fart rant over.

        • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Back when “FOSS” was “Free as in Beer” and fuck that Richard Stallman with his “free as in speech” bullshit

          FOSS has always been about “free as in speech”, and Stallman has said that it’s more ethical to illegally download closed-source software than to pay for it.

          FOSS vs. proprietary is tangential to the discussion over filesharing, anyway, because it addresses different issues. FOSS isn’t good because it’s zero-cost, it’s good because it respects user freedoms.

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s funny, I’ve never met anybody who’d have that kind of experience and use the word “hacker” in this meaning simultaneously.

          A lot of the people who think IP jives well with the internet were the ones who looked at me weird when I said I had online friends circa 2000

          This checks out.

          Back when “FOSS” was “Free as in Beer” and fuck that Richard Stallman with his “free as in speech” bullshit.

          I remember exactly the opposite, people being much more acutely aware of the difference, and Stallman being much more popular than now.

          people like Bill Gates stealing the foundations of technology

          Clarification? Movies about Steve Jobs excluded.

          • abraxas@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            It’s funny, I’ve never met anybody who’d have that kind of experience and use the word “hacker” in this meaning simultaneously.

            I’m slightly too young to use “hacker” the traditional old-MIT way. Maybe only by 2-3 years. I was a stupid kid playing with linux in the mid-90’s and I hacked into a stupid municipal dialup BBS and got root, then neither did nor changed anything because it was “cool” to prove I could figure it out. Then “Hackers” came out and I ran that movie on repeat for a few weeks and then moved on to actually learning to code.

            I remember exactly the opposite, people being much more acutely aware of the difference, and Stallman being much more popular than now.

            There’s those of us who were avoiding Redhat for shittier distros (like Slackware back then imo) because we didn’t want to buy anyone else’s beer for us to contribute for free. Maybe we were fewer than it seemed. I was that ugy giving out Ubuntu Warty CD’s having this weird pipe-dream of the tech world all going free-as-in-beer. Maybe again it relates to the exact date?

            Clarification? Movies about Steve Jobs excluded.

            Mr. Gates started back when “hacker” didn’t mean “hacker” (as you point out). He would pick up freely-given tech early on, and was then one of the first to start crying IP complaints and asserting his ownership of his product. Wherever you stand on the opinion, Gates’ Open Letter to Hobbyists started his really terrible reputation, since many hobbyests accurately alleged he built his business on tech they were using/granting for free. I never knew the facts of the 1977 BASIC case where he was sued over ownership of BASIC and won, but then in the 80’s he notoriously started his attitude of embrace, extend, extinguish. Everything from his behavior related to DOS, his ripping off Lotus Notes, etc. One could simply say “he was a good businessman” and they’re allowed to feel that way. If you say “hey, you can have as much of my water as you want for free” and I drain your lake so you have to buy water back from me, technically what I’m doing is legal. That’s basically what many people felt Gates did.

            EDIT: And I don’t have good references, but I remember some quotes from him as his reputation got bad, that the hobbyists shouldn’t have been giving software out for free anyway. That the real problem was that they should have been demanding money for their work and/or keeping their ownership. One could argue his behavior was some of what spearheaded the carefully-crafted OSS licensing in the 80’s.

      • Flower of Anarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        for real! I just noticed a show I wanted to watch Star Trek: Prodigy has been removed from Paramount+ for no fucking reason. The only reason I have that shit is because i’m a huge trekkie and I want them to make more and I think that Paramount+ is the only way they make any money for Trek and my roommate pays for it. Thank for for torrents. The show isn’t even watchable from any streaming service atm so I HAVE to pirate it. Normally I don’t for Star Trek simply because of how many episodes all the shows are combined but fuck it.

    • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      “Intellectual property” is a corpo term, and using it accepts their framing. They’re trying to conflate copyright, trademark, and patent law with property law.

      • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean, that’s exactly what all three of those were intended to do – carry property law over into a domain where it clearly doesn’t make sense. so it’s fully same-picture. none of them should exist.

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Best part is when they start pretending to be stupid, after already having demonstrated they aren’t. Which then paradoxically proves that they are.